I'd say, they're like digging your own latrine. A totally effective solution, as long as you're physically able and your needs aren't exceptional.
- 帖子
- 17
- 评论
- 586
- 加入于
- 2 yr. ago
- 帖子
- 17
- 评论
- 586
- 加入于
- 2 yr. ago
I'm not sure I understand? The country depends on urban infrastructure for sure. But population density plays a big role in how necessary services are provided. You have to be very remote and rural in most western countries to not have electricity, because it's easier to connect wires than be fully self-sufficient in energy generation. But waste pipes are harder to scale over distances, and septic tanks provide an affordable local solution. I'd love for the local council to install and maintain pumped pipes for all waste, but it would be a huge and unnecessary expense for the community.
Similarly, wherever people cluster, you can make efficient transport solutions that serve the. But if someone lives hours away from the next habitation, it's hard to create a soloution that's more efficient than them driving to the nearest transport hub. And if we could get rid of 99.9% of cars owned by people not in that situation, I don't think we need to worry to much about the few farmers who still need them.
I basically agree with you, the more public transport provided, the less people need individual transport. But as a society, there are times when the right transport soloution for a specific household is pretty much a car. There's no point in having busses driving out to my rural property multiple times a day, just for me not to use it most of the time.
That doesn't mean it needs to be a private car owned by me. A government funded by taxi service would still be more cost effective than empty buses. When I lived in another part of the country, that's what they'd replaced the busses with due to lack of demand.
But it's a complicated transition. Currently I mostly use my car and trailer to get heavy building materials, and recover architectural salvage. Sure, I could buy a new staircase and have it delivered on a lorry, but is that really better for the environment than dismantling an old one and taking a couple of trips to ship it my property? There could be solutions, such as municipal vehicle rental. But sometimes a car or van is the sensible middle ground between a bike and a bus.
I'd say it's more like, wanting a car is like wanting your own septic tank rather than a connection to municipal sewers. In an urban area it would be an insane waste of space to have individual septic tanks. But in the country the cost of building and maintaining infrastructure for just one household would be incredibly wasteful.
I think people should learn sign lanaguve causes it's cool. But if it's really for at-home, antigovernemnt planning, why not just put your phone in the other room, or the fridge? Sure, it's a minor inconvenience to take it out your pocket, but that's basically nothing compared to spending a few years being fluent enough in sign to hatch plans.
Same, really enjoy my miyoo mini. Not expensive and hours of old school fun. After a while I did start looking at more powerful handhelds to try and play n64 and early PlayStation games, but they all seemed too pricey. But it really depends what you want to play.
My experience in the UK was the gruyère was a bit bland as a cheese. But since moving to France that's changed completely. Gruyère can be of widly different qualities and aged for different times for very different end flavours. The opposite is true of cheddar, which in Britain is a big spectrum of flavours and textures, but often in France is a pretty bland 'burger cheese slice' affair.
While I believe that we'll see autonomous humanoid robots eventually, we're pretty far away from any practical version of that. What were much more likely to see in the next few years is fauxautomation, the 'mechanical turk' con, where the reality is the robot is controlled by a human.
And not only is a bullshity part of hype, it's also pretty worrying. Not just as a privacy and safety nightmare (do I really want a 'ai' robot servant who's really being controlled by some dude in a data centre in India?), but because I can see a future where people are fine with that. Just like we've outsourced shitty and exploitative factories overseas, while still enjoying the cheap production costs, I can see lots of assholes being fine with having a robot servant, even if it's being controlled by some exploited kid in a robo sweatshop. It's just outsourced slavery.
Obviously, you do you. From Google image search it seems like the world is fairly evenly split between up and down, and although I think handle up is more sane, and a little bit safer, there's no right answer. But I grab knives off my rack in a single motion, ready to chop.
Most people's hands can easily rotate thumb up or thumb down, so I don't see how the direction of the handle makes much difference. If you're used to one, it would definitely feel clunky to swap, I know I'd find grabbing a downward facing handle a bit akward.
Would totally grab one of those if they were on sale. Would love to play Ultima V on that keyboard.
- 跳过已被移除
Tax strike?
I guess the issue with those types of actions is that it leads to consequences that the people currently in power would be happy with. If people can just stop paying taxes on mass when they don't like the government it pretty much gives permission for it as a political protest from now on.
I'm not saying that it is definitely a bad idea to give the public a veto on any government policy they don't like, but it certainly promotes small government. Part of the point of government spending is spending money on things that some people don't want, whether that's 'obamacare' or the Pentagon. A government that was worried about avoiding any sizable tax strike would never be able to spend money on anyrhing but the most basic and widely accepted expenses. Even "law and order" which is often one of the few roles libertarians support spending on isn't widely accepted anymore with 'defund the police'.
Secondly, although part of a strike or protest is about causing disruption as a stick to put pressure on agreeing to demands, part of it is also on performing "costly displays". Posting memes may raise awareness for an issue, but its unlikely to sway people to your side as literally setting yourself on fire. One is easy, one is horrific, and when someone does something 'costly' it let's people see how much this matters to them. And asking me to not pay my taxes isn't a big ask, it benefits me (in the short term at least), while with a labour strike you are usually sacrificing pay to make a point, which shows how important it is to you.
What sort of psycho puts them blades up? That's crazy.
I'm not sure if they're what you're looking for, but their are various little mental exercises you can do depending on what your trying to achieve.
Relaxing visualisations - if I'm trying to sleep and I'm too worked up about something to relax, I close my eyes and visualise a peaceful scene, e.g. being on a warm tropical beach, the heat of the sun lulling me to sleep, the gentle lapping of the ocean... It doesn't always put me immediately to sleep, but it helps get my brain out of the problem-solving stress mode.
Sensory engagement - if I'm feeling anxious and getting stuck in a panicky loop, I try to engage my senses. Notice four things around you that you can see, three you can hear, two that you can smell, and a texture you can touch (a stone wall, your jacket's fabric). This works well because when I'm stressed my brain doesn't want to be told to "calm down", it's trying to warn me of danger. So instead of forcing some relaxation, I engage my senses, checking my surroundings, and generally there is no danger, just the hubub of normal life. This reminds my lizard brain that although being worried about missing a deadline is stressful, I'm not in immediate physical danger and should calm tf down.
Sense of perspective - when we are in an emergency our sense of time shrinks so we only focus on the immediate problem. As we relax, we become better able to consider the larger future. This is great in a crisis, but also leads to dumb overreactions. So, if something goes wrong, and in the grand scheme of things it's actually not a big deal, but to me right now it feels like the worst, I use this technique. I visualise my surroundings and then begin zooming out, viewing my self from above, seing the room and then the building, the pulling out like a map tool, seeing the area, the country, the globe. I sometimes continue, visualising the solar system and the milky way. After that, it feels a lot easier to shrug and accept that whatever embaressment or frustration felt like it was going to ruin my day is, in fact, just not that important.
Yeah, I was confused about some lamp always being on when I removed up, and realised I'd replaced it's smart socket with one that had previously been used for a coffee machine. Deleting and repairing sounds like wisdom.
Depends what you're comparing to. One of the ways I deal with stuff I'm finding unpleasant is to compare the experience to a worse situation. My work can be stressful, but at least I don't work 9to5, 48 weeks a year like so many people do. I'm renovating a house and it's exhausting and such a long commitment, but at least I'm in good health. Many of my friends have health problems that would make heavy labour and climbing on roofs impossible, so when I'm tired and achy at the end of a day I try and see it as a sign of my good health and strength.
Obviously, if I compared myself to a younger and fitter person, whose knees wouldn't hurt and didn't need to wear wrist braces, that could make me feel bad or envious and that would be dumb. Only make comparisons that highlight how lucky you are to be you.
Doing 'nothing much' while stoned can be good fun, but is miserable sober. Youre probably not going to feel happy without alcohol / thc if you're just remove them and don't change your lifestyle. Think about activities that weed doesn't go that well with and try and get into those. That's why 'sober' people are often the folks going for early morning runs or playing in sports clubs, or their taking on lots of projects and creating /renovating / etc. What interests you is personal, but reading, gardening, outdoor walks, climbing, community activitivism, learning a language, etc are all good choice.
Was hearing something from an English literature professor recently. He was arguing that we were on track to have a new cultural renaissance, because historically cultural transformations have come when the 'guardians of culture' (the tastesetters, the academy, etc) spend all their time in ever increasing arcane and self-referential debates. Then groups from outside of the cultural institutional power start doing something very new and vibrant and it ends up transforming cultural expression.
I guess the downside is that even 'soon' in this context could be 50 years, and it's quite likely you won't recognise or like what the new art when it emerges. Renaissance art is beautiful, but at the time it was seen as base and anti-intellectual, taking the abstract symbolism of medieval art and replacing it with "this statue of a guy looks reeeealllly like a irl guy doesn't it!" Uhh, well done Michaelangelo, I can see a naked guy whenever I go to the baths, what does your 'art' say about his place is the cosmic order, his eternal destiny and the state of his soul?
Ahh. Thanks, I hate it. Sounds horrendous and exactly like EA .
Very much not a sports guy. What's the ultimate team? And what's the problem with it?
I watched The Thief of Bagdad (1940) recently, and was kinda shocked at how much I enjoyed it. There's a whole world of effects, such as using painted backdrops, that don't look "realistic" but actually do a lot more for creating fantastical vibe than even perfect modern cgi.
It also highlights the main problem with most "effects heavy" movies, in that they often focus on the effects instead of the story. And when that happens, it doesn't really matter how good they are, because fundamentally they're distracting from real core of the film. TToB has genies, monsters and flying robot horses, but they're all used judiciously and reinforce a sense of wonder, even when they look a little janky to modern eyes.
Compared this to The 7th Voyage of Sinbad (1958), which was celebrated at the time for it's Harryhausen stop motion effects. Sure, the effects are pretty cool, and at the time must have been very impressive, but it's too obvious that the audience is meant to be wowed by them. At one point two animated monster start fighting each other and I just didn't care. Aside from the novelty of the effect this scene wasn't building the vibes, they're weren't any significant stakes or character growth, it was just "look at what we can do!". Yawn.