Violence to stop violence seems ok, if it's in a situation where it would work.
Though, nowadays there are some who throw around the word fascist, maybe to muddle the waters or channel hate against people they dislike. I've seen some people claim that the first major socialist experiment was fascist under their Georgian leader. That seems to be misdirection.
What would be its uses?Or what would be the fun things it would use?
I think a local 'AI'-sh thing for grammar correction would be good for non-English folk learning the language.Or maybe one that makes formatting easier? Tho, having regex with some shortcuts may be more efficient there.
Under Churchill millions of Indians died in the Bengal famineThere was the Madras famine before that, which is less known.British rule killed millions of Indians.
USAmerica caused the genocide in Guatemala. Carpet bombed Vietnam, Laos, Korea etc.Couped ChileThe war on terror stuffThe Indonesian massacre on anti-capitalists or neutrals
Tried to threaten India during the Bangladeshi independence movement, by sending ships with nuclear weapons.The U S S R sent its nuclear submarines to create a stalemate.
The capitalist country tried to threaten us with atomic weapons and the communist nation helped us get a stalemate and stable existence using their own.
France arranging coups in African nations.
Why stop at those who died under rule of Stalin, why not compare the deaths caused by capitalist nations in their conquests to defend freedom and democracy and educate the brown and black people?
Only one country has used atomic bombs on civillian towns, that too twice.The main countries that have a 'No first use policy' are U S S R(past), India and China.
Aren't the communists and socialists the decent ones there?You can say that it is a superficial move for propaganda. If so, why didn't the other major countries do the same?It indeed shows a difference in policy.
*AI in its current form, owned by the very wealthy, right?