Skip Navigation

帖子
44
评论
51
加入于
2 yr. ago

A bisexual nonbinary poster of memes and other things • They/Them

  • From my understanding how a body responds to HRT is basically down to luck. Changes can be large, small, fast and slow. The chances of seeing large changes might decrease over time but is probably never zero.

    One thing to note is that we are often our worst critics. We see all the things that haven't changed or things changed so gradually that we never noticed. These changes can be obvious to those around us while we remain blind to them.

    The question I would ask is do you want to continue taking HRT? Is it causing you an undue burden or harm? Will stopping make you feel better? Will stopping make you feel worse? These are probably things to discuss with a doctor to help you come to a decision.

  • The fabled Blahaj cuddle pile.

  • Numbers going up does feel nice and a post not gaining any traction can be disappointing.

    Nice thing about Lemmy is it is so small that local and global new feeds are actually usable. Even new communities with no subscribers can get plenty of views from those alone.

  • That's exactly why it needs to be something you are willing to explain. It makes their stories better.

  • License changes that will charge developers based on how many installs their game has instead of how many units sold.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Pir(ule)ate

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    manifesto rule

  • Straight shooter is an idiom meaning honest and straightforward or direct. Super is acting as an intensifier. Combined it means they are extremely honest and direct.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    sisyphus rule

  • rule

    跳过
  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • They'll just keep giving you shots of Ambien until you stop.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    par(ule)amedic

  • There is [email protected]. Those of us who watch the local feed will see it.

    There's also not so many posts in most communities that you need separate spaces to ask questions. So any community related to the question should be fine. [email protected] is probably the most general one here.

  • Awesome book too.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    system rule

  • If you want to see how weird it can get look at blightsight. Your consciousness can be blind but your body can still react to visual stimulus.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    ally rule

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • Stop looking inside me. It's mostly just meat.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • You are kind of hitting on one of the issues I see. The model and the works created by the model may b considered two separate things. The model itself may not be infringing in of itself. It's not actually substantially similar to any of the individual training data. I don't think anyone can point to part of it and say this is a copy of a given work. But the model may be able to create works that are infringing.

  • That is not actually one of the criteria for fair use in the US right now. Maybe that'll change but it'll take a court case or legislation to do.

  • NPR reported that a "top concern" is that ChatGPT could use The Times' content to become a "competitor" by "creating text that answers questions based on the original reporting and writing of the paper's staff."

    That's something that can currently be done by a human and is generally considered fair use. All a language model really does is drive the cost of doing that from tens or hundreds of dollars down to pennies.

    To defend its AI training models, OpenAI would likely have to claim "fair use" of all the web content the company sucked up to train tools like ChatGPT. In the potential New York Times case, that would mean proving that copying the Times' content to craft ChatGPT responses would not compete with the Times.

    A fair use defense does not have to include noncompetition. That's just one factor in a fair use defense and the other factors may be enyon their own.

    I think it'll come down to how "the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes" and "the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole;" are interpreted by the courts. Do we judge if a language model by the model itself or by the output itself? Can a model itself be uninfringing and it still be able to potentially produce infringing content?

  • rule

    跳过
  • I'm going to blame that completely on kbin being weird.

    But a Zelenskyy/Ken movie about them getting off the beach and riding horses might be fun. Especially if you can show horn in a "I don't need a ride" line by Zelenskyy. By the end he realizes he does need a ride, a ride to the front lines.

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    hair(ule)

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    rule