If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's.
Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up)
Yes, it's not a good argument totally unsupported. You can live in a society and still criticise it, if there's no reasonable choice to do otherwise.
The thing is, I really like not having to weave my own clothes, or do whatever trade was made obsolete by all the technologies since. I'm guessing OP does too, and there's no good reason to place a cutoff on that at 2020.
If OP thought things would genuinely be better if we went back to medieval tech, this would be a different, and actually much more interesting conversation. As it is, they just didn't know the history.
Well then you'd probably be fine all the way back to premodern times, assuming you can convince clients to trust you with their mine water pump or whatever. As long as you could get along without devoted replacement parts.
Once you reach that point, the modern lathe thing becomes an issue, a commercial foundry might not be around for cast parts, and the technology to cast ferrous metals at all isn't guarenteed. The ability to perfectly eyeball things and use relatively primitive materials becomes a major constraint. If you master that, you can probably hack it all the way back to early civilisation building crossbows or animal-powered pumps.
Even with the advanced flight characteristics of a modern fighter, I’d guess they don’t really need the power modern chips are capable of offering.
I mean, it's not just fly-by-wire. If they do any signal processing in CPU or GPU they'd need power - and I'm sure they do for the higher level processing, since they're always updating things like target identification and electronic countermeasures to keep pace.
The F-35, for example, famously has all kinds of automatic combat information and networked communications management as well, and includes a display that allows pilots to virtually see through the floor. It adds up to 4 million lines of code or so. (All proprietary and controlled by America, which has made Canada's acquisition deal a political hot potato post-Trump)
Hmm. Before the end of the 19th century you're going to run into non-standardised/completely bespoke parts problems. How are you on a lathe, or doing blacksmith work? Hot riveting was a separate trade which you wouldn't have to do, at least.
I'm kinda obsessed with what I call technological bootstrapping, and so I have useful book knowledge about every step along the way. Doing it in practice is another thing, though; the locals are going to run circles around me unless I can invent stuff. (And even the scenario rules aside, not starving or being "disturbed" while I work on whatever project is a thing)
So, I think I have to echo the "it's not going great in 2025" answer.
It's a different time, probably normal civilian chips to hitch onto the massive industry that now exists. Kind of like how I'd guess the F-14 airframe was made of normal metal instead of something new they invented.
The radar and EWAR-related hardware, on the other hand, might not just be off the shelf.
Yeah, but they were talking about building out WhatsApp third party compatibility on top of it.
There already was Element One, which bridged to a bunch of things for a small subscription fee, although it had to break E2EE to do so. I'm just finding a lot of broken links now, though.
Eh, depends what you mean by isolated. I've had weird incidents with otherwise fine people. And I've definitely ended up doing things that were hard to explain for whatever reason. I'm guessing the brother is generally problematic, though, because that was multiple consecutive decisions driven by thinly-masked cruelty.
I'm not sure what you mean. Try again in a week or two?
I did detect that this was about the whole "LLMs ruin everything" jerk. The thing is, they're new, and misinfo has been around in other forms for a long time. It doesn't negate the things you do now - like talking to me, despite the fact we're probably in different countries - that would have been very hard in the 20th century, and impossible much before then. Relevant XKCD.
Okay, to be a bit glib, why don't you ask someone in real life? After all, it's all disinformation on here.
Sure, the information age comes with problems, but do consider what the world was like before. There were a lot of things people just didn't know and couldn't ever look up or ask about - unless they were motivated enough to dig through a library.
They let OpenWhisper do the underlying protocol, so it's solid. Beats the shit out of a plain text message anyway, and people IRL might actually have it.
If we did what they wanted, I couldn't afford the clothes I'm wearing. Or probably a lot of other things - shit tons has improved since the late 1700's.
Sure, there's less weaver jobs now, and there will be less digital artist jobs in the future. Arguably, the past few centuries have shown that if there's other things that we can do instead, it's still for the best. (If there's not, a whole new conversation opens up)