The website itself needs a really small amount of money. Most of the money goes for other stuff which might not seem useful to you.
They make it seem like they don’t have money but it’s quite the opposite: they increase their spendings based on their revenue. They have enough for many years.
Don’t donate to them. There are far better ways to spend your money than a foundation that doesn’t really do anything on Wikipedia and that still actively blocks anonymous proxies.
If you can do that to someone you say you love, I don't think you love them.
What? You have serious problems if you believe that. I don’t get what you’re saying. I’m saying using a tool for mutual masturbation (or one at a time) is the same as classical normal masturbation of each other. Both are acceptable and normal in a relationship.
Not relevant. When discussing techniques for the application of hair products, those with alopecia are not relevant.
It does when it’s frequent. Also, you’re the one making a generalization, so if you don’t specify, that’s on you
As for your last paragraph, well I don’t see any link with what I said. Unrelated
If the point was the orgasm, mutial masturbation would be faster, easier, cleaner, etc.
Isn't this exactly what it is? "use my vibrator with a partner" either means the partner uses it or stimulates them while they do
People can achieve touchless orgasm if they have the psychological/emotional investment. If she’s not cumming, I question the relationship, not the sex.
Let's ignore all medical and social reasons as to why someone can't cum; it must surely be because the relationship between the two partners!
Frankly I don't really get your comment. What I'm saying is: using a tool for sex isn't bad as long as you're doing it together?
Nope
Wikimedia the tool is great, the foundation behind it, not so much