UFO's are allowed to use roads in non-emergency situations as well. They land on low traffic roads and then quickly exit off the side of the road. Something about the way ufo's are built, its actually safer for them to land on hard pavement and then transfer to grass then it is for them to land on grass directly.
I think the reason the UFO road sharing laws are so unclear is because they are so new and already changing a lot. For example, some cities have banned UFO road landings and some states have built helipads specifically for UFOs, eliminating the need for road landing. However, I have seen one ufo trying to make a road landing while I was driving before. I just kind've pulled to the shoulder and waited as I wasn't sure what the rules were.
For a flying saucer, if they have the ground-facing spotlight on they are preparing to land. They don't keep the spotlight on if they don't need visibility of the ground. In fact, that would be reckless as the spotlight might blind (not literally, but just light glare) people on the ground.
The UFO could be issued a citation for taking an unauthorized vehicle on a public roadway
It's not that simple though. UFO's are allowed to land on public roadways if they do so safely (on a low traffic road, not blocking multiple lanes, exits the roadway quickly after landing).
This is a strange take. I never said poor people should starve. In fact, I think they deserve better then just canned food. Therefore I suggest donating cash instead of canned goods. That way the food bank can buy fresher foods.
Anyways, it seems like this statement definitely needed more explanation and context by me, which wasn't possible when just posting it as a shower thought.
To which I’d say yes both seem helpful to an organization that helps people in need.
But cash is much more universal and allows the cancer research organization to get exactly what they need rather then whatever needles people feel like donating. It's the same thing with food pantries. You can donate 10 cans of vegetable soup, but if the food bank doesn't need that at the time, you've just wasted your money on vegetable soup when you could have just donated cash.
A lot of people seem to be misinterpreting me here. I don't want poor people to starve, nor do I want people to reuse needles. All I'm saying is that cash is a lot more universal and useful to food pantries than going to the store and buying cans is. Also many food pantries have deals with companies where they can get the food cheaper. So buying cans of food to donate is also a worse deal.
Edit: I understand donating cans of food your household isn't going to use, but in some school food drives for instance, students get extra credit for donating cans, which encourages people to go out and buy cans.
Makes sense. I think if there are no cars behind you, stopping and letting the saucer land is the best way to go