designed an "advanced flow" for installing unverified apps. This new system is specifically intended for developers and power users who have a higher risk tolerance and want the ability to download unverified apps.
It is not a casual toggle. The advanced flow is built to resist exploitation. The company emphasizes that the flow is designed to resist coercion, ensuring users aren't tricked into bypassing safety checks under pressure from scammers. Social engineering often walks victims through dismissing every warning on screen, so Google is adding friction that fights back.
That can very well mean we'll be compiling everything by hand and sending it via USB app by app
From what has been explained to me in some other posts, the issue is that most probably this will land on AOSP level from which all de-Googled androids fork. And with Linux phones not quite ready yet (I'm observing https://liberux.net/ though) that leaves us at their mercy
I think that would be doubly hard. Not only that would require to crawl the web, I am sure that ad providers have a lot of logic to not spend resources on showing ads to bots
I know this is not what you are looking for but I feel this is an occasion to plug https://adnauseam.io/
On second thought, try to find out which driver your new network card needs and install it before the switch. As long as you have command line and network (USB drivers for keyboard should not be an issue) you can install whatever is missing
Btw, there are two command line browsers that I know of: links and lynx. Copying commands from phone gets tedious fast
In general it shouldn't. You might need to install some new drivers for the new chipset but in itself the system should work. Especially since nowadays kernels are shipped with a lot of stuff and I'm guessing you're not compiling yours Regarding messing up with live environment, I don't remember if GPT is enough for UEFI to load your bootloader or maybe you might need to install something in there
It would be cool if there was an option to tell compiler how to name the object in the end. A strength of C mangling (or rather lack of it) is that you can take the object file and know beforehand the names. With mangling that will always depend on the version of the compiler. In practice, while mangled names are kind of stable, mangled C++ names are not really reliable in the real world
If we could tell the compiler "in the end name/alias this function as prefix_or_name_of_cargo_my_super_duper_function", we could then easily call it in an assembler/pure C/etc It could even be a separate wrapper. only for exposing stable function names in the object files
I haven't digged a lot in that topic but when discord comes up I always wonder if network effect is the only thing that stops stoat.chat from replacing it
I love the ingenuity of that flip. He wanted it to sound cool; new name seemed to be invulnerable to mockery. But in the confusion following the change the boot licking news-places started making sure that no one mixes up the new name - "X, former Twitter". Which shortens up just too perfect. If not for that, calling it Xitter would feel a little bit too much. But with that mouthful being banged on everywhere, it all just fell together perfectly
I think it might be nice if such posts included some background
Build for web, desktop, and mobile, and more with a single codebase. Zero-config setup, integrated hot-reloading, and signals-based state management. Add backend functionality with Server Functions and bundle with our CLI.
I don't think everyone is up to date on every Rust library that exists
I guess you are being downvoted because that is not directly connected to Rust. It would be a problem with any language
Yeah, compiling from source on Windows is a mess. In that regard it is not a functional OS, one has to install a lot of tools in order to compile the tiniest thing
I would put both ways into the descriptions, just for that one lost person that for some reason has to compile from source on Windows, just to give them a hint where to start. I think, it's also very probable that if they have to compile from source, they might have a lot of issues with getting VS to work. It will be a pain anyway, most will probably just download your binary and hope you prefer mining bitcoin instead of ransoming their whole drive
So basically Mastodon? Just don't follow any tags