I've seen the chart, but the problem is I don't understand the point of some of the things in the chart. The installation instructions are also kind of lacking since I don't understand Docker well, but it just says to install Cosmos via Docker. I could take a couple of days to learn all this and sacrifice my limited family time, for something I think has a potential benefit, or I could just install one of the other two.
If those features are extremely useful and important, then yes, I'll have to learn it and I guess that makes Cosmos the best choice. If they're not really needed, then I guess I should pick one of the other two.
Mostly I'll be running Jellyfish, file storage and retrieval, and eventually probably something for Valetudo in the future. Also considering putting Waydroid in there somehow to run Stube on the TV as well. But would all those features be incredibly important to have something like Cosmos then?
I think there's a line where mandates are authoritarian and where they aren't, and it comes down the house beneficial for society or a group it is, but in particular also how exclusionary it is. Your view on determining it by face value is too simple for this.
For example, if you mandate only Hispanic kids to wear uniforms, by your logic, that is more moral and less authoritarian because less students are being made to wear a uniform as opposed to all of them.
Yet, it's obvious that is not the case, despite fitting into your statement.
Likewise, individualism has limits before it's simply chaos too, and therefore should also be looked as to what point it instead brings harm. People here have, for example, listed many reasons not having a uniform code can be detrimental as well (wealth class divisions, strengthening of cliques, weakening of the student body's efforts against things an administration will do).
Not to mention, even in your call for a lack of uniforms, you are still technically imposing mandates: not only against those who do wish to have them, but likely against what people want to actually wear. I doubt you want students going in boxers or bikinis for example.
And lastly, I'd like to mention that socialism is counter to authoritarianism. Authoritarianism might use some socialist aspects sometimes, but socialism itself isn't in the same spectrum as authoritarianism.
It's only authoritarian if the teachers / administration also wear a similar uniform, but slightly different to denote rank.
Otherwise, it's actually accidentally kind of socialistic, in that the divisions of class between your peers becomes less obvious, and there's more cohesion with your fellow students versus those in authority. It's easier for the students to rally together against something when they're all wearing the same thing.
Otherwise, it's actually beneficial to authoritarians to have no dress code, because student cliques would strengthen, and infighting would be more common.
For the USA, think about how both major parties use color to help separate people. If the colors of Democrats and Republicans were the same though, the division would be weaker.
Uniforms have historically been used to unify groups rather than to control them.
Revolut is subject to EU laws which are much stricter than US ones. It's not like Wells Fargo, an actual US bank, hasn't already messed with Americans by just straight up stealing from them. Wells Fargo would've been dead by now in the EU for their shenanigans.
Well you started spouting nonsense so I assumed you were a bot.
Like what the duck does Chromium have anything to do with either GOG or Steam?