And the type of targeting that makes it so I can’t safely have a home server is more like how I keep facing serious accusations of crimes I haven’t committed, false arrests, accusations of pedophilia, etc.
You have not been accused of being a pedophile. You have been "accused" of saying that CSAM should be allowed to be hosted online (because you said it).
Right. I’m also prepared for the possibility you will start harassing me in the very near future. Why do you need me to explain your own behavior to you?
How would I do that? Why would you assume I would do that? All I've done is reply to you in a thread.
Incorrect. Repeating yourself doesn’t make it true. Try deleting or editing comments, if that will be enough to hide them from mods/admins. Or just keep lying if this place is actually corrupt enough for that to yield worthwhile results on its own.
It wouldn't be enough to hide them because instance admins can see deleted posts. But in any case, I haven't insulted you. You have insulted me repeatedly.
These are quotes prefaced with “me:” and “you:” suggesting you’re just recapping part of the conversation again. Why? Would this be worth my time to read?
It's the relevant component where you larped as a martyr.
Baselessly, as if I would be gullible enough to take your word for it.
How would it get you banned? You might get banned for actually inciting violence, but not explaining your position on the legality of it.
If you have a design that enables the incitement of violence against war criminals and no one else, maybe someone is all ears. I don’t really care, I’m still kinda tired of you wasting my time.
You don't have to reply to me, you know. I'm not forcing you to do so. I'm not making you "waste your time" by replying. You choose to do so.
For crying out loud. You just said: “That 100% isn’t healthy, there needs to be a balance where each place has some of each group. I don’t want a place full of nothing but pedophiles, but I also don’t want a place full of nothing but people who send pedophiles to their own place.”
Yes, I’m pretty sure I did say that.
Right, so naturally in order for that happen the moderated side of lemmy would have to change to have some of that group.
My god, you've forgotten almost everything spoken about merely a few posts beforehand.
Today’s capitalism making people need money to survive, authorities threatening to arrest people who run websites that host “child porn,” etc.
I don't think lemmy.world admins want to host child porn in the first place. Like my assumption is that the reason they don't is not just because its against the law, but also because they just don't want to - because they're opposed to child porn at a moral level. So this isn't really a "pressure" if they happen to agree with the law, and have no problem following it.
I said, when describing the 'authorities' of the Fediverse that it's comprised of the users, mods and admins. You said I "left a lot out". Who else did I leave out here?
Do what? If you mean the things I’ve claimed ICANN does, that’s incorrect. I haven’t really said anything about ICANN that would be a big secret or anything. It’s all pretty widely documented.
So what? Do you need "ask" for me to point this stuff out? I obviously gave them as examples for where you've refused to elaborate on particular points.
I don't report much, but that guy was (is) something else dude. I'm not a free speech absolutist.