Seems like you’re accusing me of having a persecution complex, which I don’t. You might, though.
Dude, you think you're some sort of dissident because people are disagreeing with you in a forum thread.
Again, not sure what you mean.
You unironically compared yourself to political dissidents my dude. To the point where you think it would somehow impede your ability to run your own lemmy instance.
I don’t remember the adult.swim part at the time but why are you recapping the discussion instead of continuing it?
I added it in shortly afterwards. And I posted it because you seemed lost, and needed a recap as to what I was referring to. As usual. You did deny that instances could have their own themes.
I don’t see how it’s a point, and it’s weird how you keep copying and pasting random quotes from me and then changing the subject without answering, while I copy and paste quotes from you and then answer them.
You barely answer me ever. You get lost all of the time.
You keep asking this, like you can’t figure out the answer for yourself. It’s kind of amusing.
So no evidence. Of course. "Me when I make things up".
I don’t think I claimed that. You were clearly pretending to forget, not actually forgetting. I made it clear that seemed pretty obvious from how you had just mentioned examples yourself, right before asking for them.
I did neither.
My point is that it's laughable to claim abuse when you keep coming back for more, so to speak.
I'm not holding you captive, making you respond. That it upsets you so much is an entirely self-inflicted problem.
Incorrect. You brought up the topic they were a subtopic in. Why do you keep repeating the same lies? Is there a reason other than that you’re deeply mentally ill?
I don’t know. I don’t even care about the answer anymore. I’ve repeatedly told you I will mainly respond to what your words mean instead of trying to guess your secret meanings.
Banned as in your account shut down and being made inaccessible by the administrators/owner. Sometimes IP banned.
That’s not a point, and you seem to be implying I’m incorrectly denying what rules are here instead of correctly rejecting misuse of English (e.g. saying “can’t” when meaning “shouldn’t")
This is such an utterly frivolous correction.
This seems like another reply where you’re trying to bait me to give you some kind of justification for banning me or removing my comments. I can’t respond appropriately unless you try again on nostr.
You wouldn't get banned for justifying why people should get to incite violence towards others. You might lose reputation though.
It’s also probably not anything like that. Breaking it down into components, I try to remember not to say brand names like “Fediverse” have “goals” like people, and even though I mess that up sometimes, I also don’t know if the people who run the “Fediverse brand name” want to outgrow reddit, so I don’t think I’d say that.
The Fediverse just is what it's shorthand referred to now because it's not just Lemmy that people use. I'm not o na Lemmy instance.
Incorrect. I haven’t discussed it enough to do that. I barely know what the “fediverse” is at all. It’s only been mentioned in this thread a few times, where I have been able to understand enough to give logical replies.
Precisely. So I don't know you're taking such a strong position on what the future ought be when you're broadly unfamiliar with vast amounts of it.
By being less censored than Reddit, and both being complete garbage and full of slop, spam and trolls.
The lack of anyone else demonstrating the same level of fluency as me despite what seems like immense pressure to do so in the current state of the anglosphere / planet
How would they do that? You've spoken to everyone to know that you have better fluency?
Also, is there a way to tell if (or maybe when) a post here is edited, so you could prove your answer with numbered links?
Why should I do that?
If I remember right you said “these rules” but it was a question, so it’s acting like I somehow know what set of rules you mean when you didn’t establish a group of rules to be talking about before calling it “these rules”
No, it wasn't.
I was asking what pressure the lemmy.world admins were supposedly under when they made the instance.
You don't even know most of the active lemmy instances. I find it unlikely that you have any evidence of any Lemmy instance having being shut down by the "authorities" (tm)
“Less censored” and “more garbage” are both heavily debatable, but why did you bring this up? What’s the relevance?
It shows that we have a good idea what will happen without censorship.
I didn’t ask, but why did you put this right after a part where you ignored yet another question I asked? At least it was explicitly a rhetorical question this time, but still weird behavior to keep copying and pasting all the questions for no reason.
I don't really give a fuck about your questions.
I’ll half-answer this if you answer one of the many questions you’ve ignored from me.
It's pathetic that it took so many posts for you to finally acknowledge this question.
What do you mean by “these?”
What sort of comical Jordan Peterson style reply is this lmao
Why are you asking again and acting like it isn’t clear when I’ve answered this question in very clear wording multiple different ways for you already?
You use the word "authorities" in such a vague and bizarre way that it's like someone just saying "the man!" The "authorities" here seem to be the active userbase, so far as I can tell, and community moderators and instance admins - most of whom all desire a moderated experience as most people on here, as I've said, don't want to use a forum with no rules.
Same reason they created FCC licenses, same reason they started taking subreddits away from reddit mods by force, etc.
Reddit has always been able and willing to take away subreddits from moderators, and has done so since its inception. That doesn't really have anything with domain names and IP blocking.
Not sure what FCC licences would have to do with anything here. What specific "authority" would even be blocking IP addresses and domain names from Lemmy?
You want instances that can’t block each other, even if you’d probably don’t mind if users can block instances, i’ve seen that same thought in /c/fediverse a few times ;
How would this even be possible? This is essentially forced platforming.
They did. I'm sorry, but they did. Most of them focused on his inane objection to any and all moderation and fundamental misunderstandings of the fediverse and how it actually works. He doesn't really know anything about it, and makes baseless about what's happened on the site that he refuses to back up.
But again, the core thing here is that most of the people on the fediverse are not free speech absolutists who want to operate in an instance with no moderation.
Dude, you think you're some sort of dissident because people are disagreeing with you in a forum thread.
You unironically compared yourself to political dissidents my dude. To the point where you think it would somehow impede your ability to run your own lemmy instance.