Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Y
Posts
8
Comments
132
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • The cars done even use Tesla's famous electric motor design (induction motors), I believe they use switched reluctance motors. Def a smart design choice, but not on brand!

  • rule

    Jump
  • I mean, she just has to serve out once in a match to win the scenario in this question. I don't think it's that unreasonable.

  • Yeah, the hands look like they've been replaced/repaired... And not very well.

  • Yeah, choose SCUBA spelunking like a real daredevil!

  • True love is knowing the exact line between playful annoying and rage-inducing annoying. It takes a while to dial in. I can tell you've found it.

  • Hey! Fuck you chemicalwonka! Your nuanced, slightly different opinion enrages me! We're enemies now.

  • What is the other meaning of undead?

  • I agree, LLMs have the amazingly human ability to bumble into the right answer even if they don't know why.

    It seems to me that a good analogy of our experience is a whole bunch of LLMs optimized for different tasks that have some other LLM scheduler/administrator for the lower level models that is consciousness. Might be more layers deep, but that's my guess with no neurological or machine learning background.

  • This is a cool take! I don't think I agree though. I assume we developed pattern recognition before music/language. Many animals have the ability to note attributes about plants and animals even without the ability to communicate complex ideas (ie language or oral tradition). I assume that type of pattern recognition was a good blueprint for functions like music and language, but my guess is it started from a general pattern recognition, then was retuned for music and language.

    Again, pure speculation, but there is some logic behind it!

  • This seems reasonable to me, a very unqualified source in neurology.

  • I don't think value to society weighs into the equation, just the ratio of salary to ownership wealth gain.

    There are bad people in the working class that are a net detriment to society, just as there are good people in the owning class that are a net benefit. Those good and bad deeds don't change how they accrue wealth and therefore don't change their class.

    This working class isn't a morality judgement, it's a wealth ratio per individual.

  • According to Forbes, on average 60% of CEO compensation is equity. In short, I was wrong. My bad!

  • Working class means your primary wealth generation tool is selling your labor. The compensation plans vary widely, but I think most CEOs are earning most of their wealth through a salary vs returns on things they own.

    You can hate it all you want, but that's what working class means.

  • This is my biggest frustration with these posts. We might not like it, but CEOs are still working class. Most of their wealth is derived from a paycheck. They aren't even the owning class. They're rich AF, but they're a symptom more than a problem.

  • There's a skatepark near me that is still bumping. All ages, all times of day. There is even this guy who lives in his car that comes out an practices DJing out there. It's an awesome little community.

  • This writeup is such an interesting perspective of social media.

    It's the medium for the human hive mind. It's civilization's consciousness. It's beyond any individual's control or comprehension, and it exists for advertising...

  • Does this mean go out and buy toilet paper?

  • Solid comic!

    I grow crystals all day. I have a cool idea for a video game so I've been learning Godot recently too.

  • What does this mean? Cameras? Machines that can identify things via images?