Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Y
Posts
8
Comments
132
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • All valid points. Compliance would have to be a staple, which makes enforcement and oversight critical.

    Where would you want the tax revenue to go in your country?

    Personally, I'd be happy with a blanket tax return. Take the money generated by last year's carbon tax, divide it by the number of tax payers, and call it a day. Since wealthy people typically have a higher carbon impact (pay more into the tax), this would average out to a small redistribution of wealth towards the less fortunate.

  • Countries within the FTA obviously will not want their carbon taxed products competing with 'polluted products'. This gives countries in the FTA an incentive to place tariffs on goods produced outside the FTA. This would make it difficult or expensive to export into the FTA if a country isn't a member. The benefits are the access to the FTA markets (more or less).

  • I don't think it would, but certainly worth discussing. Countries in the FTA would have an incentive to put tariffs on products produced outside the FTA zone to bring them inline with 'carbon taxed' prices. These tariffs would be legal to impose until the country joins the carbon tax FTA. Countries that don't join the FTA would (or at least could) have trouble exporting products into the FTA zone which would give them incentive to join or risk economic harm.

  • You wouldn't get to pick 'which nations'. What I'm describing would be a blanket statement: If you implement a carbon tax you can sign into this Free Trade Agreement club. Any nation in that club automatically has the same FTA with every other country.

    "A Free Trade Agreement isn't something universally good." - Totally agree, but I think we can also agree that it would create an incentive for countries within the agreement to trade more with each other than with outsiders. It would also provide an incentive for the outside countries to join the club (specifically after it has reached some critical mass).

    Industries within countries could definitely be negatively effected because of the FTA. I get that. All industry will be negatively effected if climate change isn't curbed though. This seems like a way to make a tangible policy today that builds economic incentives for a carbon free future. It does not require full world 'sign off' before you start. It can start with just two countries drafting this open-invite FTA and allow any other country into the club once they've proven they have a carbon tax.

  • Also the fact that 'less moving parts' doesn't mean lower complexity or maintenance cost. Train wheels are a very robust and efficienct mechanism and most train designs are not being limited by them.

  • Disguise?

  • What is this, amateur hour? You don't soundproof your bathroom? How many years since COVID is this?

  • About 2x the cost as it is elsewhere! Also roughly half the price as somewhere else. I'd say generally housing in my area goes around market price.

  • Perfect analogy with the mule.

    Stumbles his way into being a background character; an annoyance to the main actors and the plot. Then turns out to be the puppet master all along. I love this fan theory mostly because it is the only way to make Jar Jar a retroactively tolerable character.

  • Then you plead the 5th. Pretty sure that's exactly what it's intended for.

  • For real! Those worms are among the ... hell, they are the best!

  • This is the exact path I took, and I highly recommend it. Code academy python then immediately wrote some code to scrape some websites and email me if something I wanted to buy dropped to a price I'd be willing to spend.

    I'd say all in all it took 3 weeks to a month, but I've been able to not code for months at a time and still feel comfortable when I come back.

    I am NOT a programmer, I am someone who can cobble something together to accomplish a specific task. I never got to the more abstract concepts you listed, but maybe one day!

  • I love these videos so much and cannot recommend them enough. No narrative, no music, no ads, just well placed camera shots to make the whole thing self explanatitory. I feel like I have learned so much from him and I have never heard his voice.

  • Duck

    Jump
  • What about a fertilized but unhatched duck egg? That's kinda both a duck and not a duck.

    I think you'd consider a roast duck a duck, but what about a duck drumstick? Would you say that's not a duck? If so, how much of the roast duck needs to be connected for it to be a duck?

    🦆

  • Fantastic description!

  • You certainly would see longer ranges for the same battery if you just swapped the cabling and motor over to superconducting versions, but there are kind of two scenarios at play here.

    You have highway driving where a lot of your losses are mechanical due to high sustained speeds (air resistance and friction). Those wouldn't go away, but your "electrical to mechanical" losses would be reduced, so you'd see modest improvements.

    Then you have around town driving where your losses from accelerating and decelerating are much larger than the mechanical losses (air resistance and friction). Here with proper design changes I think you would see spectacular improvements in efficiency.

    Unfortunately, this doesn't help much with the EV 'range anxiety' issue haha. Go figure.

  • There are two major mechanisms at work with a solar panel circuit. The production of "free electrons" and then the flow of the "free electrons". Solar panels are basically special crystals that make the "free electrons" when they're hit with sunlight. Once the 'free electrons' are produced, they flow through conductors to do whatever electrical work we want them to do.

    The that special crystal is what is inefficient and it can't be replaced with superconductors. Only the flow portion of this circuit could be replaced with superconductors.

    I hope this helped, it's a pretty simplified explanation.

  • Understood, my mistake. This is pure speculation, but I doubt you'd see those in consumer electronics. Those energy storage devices would essentially be very power electromagnets and I really don't think people would be walking around with those in their pockets. I do agree that they would be super useful for grid-level energy storage though! If you can engineer around the large magnetic field they'd create it would be a super efficient energy storage device!

    Also, sorry in advance - this is me being nit-picky, but that would be more analogous to replacing a battery with an inductor (not a capacitor). Inductors store energy in magnetic fields, capacitors store them in electric fields. Doesn't really matter... I'm just being pedantic.

  • That's not going to happen though. Superconductors won't make capacitors store energy for longer durations. They won't improve battery chemistry technology. They won't significantly improve CPU efficiency. They'd make consumer electronics slightly more efficient, but replacing all the conductors in your phone with superconductors isn't going to make your battery last even 25% longer.