In many cases, the best decision for the firm is the one that directly undermines the company it controls.
How though? I don't doubt this is a real thing, but there isn't really a satisfying explanation being offered here. What the article is saying sounds like the process is, take profitable business, throw in garbage, somehow more profit. Where's the money coming from?
The ruling came after the cities of Sedro Woolley and Stanwood sued Jose Rodriguez in civil court to block his records requests. Both cities have since turned off their Flock camera systems.
The FBI really wants people having discussions that are limited to just the headline I guess...
Even if legal attacks don't work, I've noticed a few sites I read articles from have paywalls that are no longer bypassable by archive.is, and so I'm kind of at a loss as to how to link them, except maybe by copying the text myself. But that has a number of disadvantages, such as, copied text is not an authoritative source because most people can't verify it wasn't altered. It's usually not a problem reading it myself because all the text shows up in the rss feed, but what's lacking is a way to share it.
No caffeine multiple days in a row. I often enjoy it, and I don't think it's really that bad for you, but I don't like the way it adjusts my personality and state of mind if that makes sense and it's easy to get addicted enough to start feeling like crap if you don't have any.
Maybe a manual dial to cycle through the available nearby vehicles then. The idea is just that there should be a way for it to be clear who you are contacting and where their vehicle is on the road relative to yours.
My interpretation of Book of Job is God and Satan are in a toxic relationship where they egg each other on to fuck with people so you shouldn't trust either of them.
To me the situation you're describing and the OP situation seem pretty similar; using threats to overrule the established system of property rights. But of course that system is how society decides what new people can move in, and something has to decide that.
If there are actually no bugs, can't that create a situation where it's impossible to break it? Not to say this is actually a thing AI can achieve, but it doesn't seem like bad logic.
Make sure you are also doing fun and nice things for yourself while sober, and not just reserving it for when you're high. Expectations and associations make a big difference, if you're taking a drug with the intention and belief that it will make you feel a certain way, that alone might make it work.
Except for alcohol, which will make often you feel like shit even if you expect it to make you feel good. Congrats on quitting.
There are ultra low powered LLMs but even then you're looking at at least 2GB, and the most typical graphics card has 8, so it's going to be some impact at least. Their intelligence/capability scales hard with memory usage too, so for most things you might want to use it for the smallest ones likely would not be good enough.
For example there's a Rimworld mod that adds locally generated flavor text dialogue, using such a low powered model. But it's a really simple feature that doesn't affect actual gameplay at all. Games where the gameplay interacts with LLM output in any way are going to have higher hardware requirements, to the point where they will need to use the graphics card more for that part and less for the actual graphics; it's enough of a bottleneck that anyone wanting to do this will basically need to design the game around it.
I use this and contributed a small bug fix to it the other year. It's pretty functional, although one thing I wish it did is have a way to see quarantined/spam labeled messages instead of the filter just blackholing them.
You just don't get it by only concealing IP address. I bet if they also managed to avoid browser fingerprinting and giving clues about their location through their use of the site, that would have been enough that Reddit isn't showing advertising based on location.
How though? I don't doubt this is a real thing, but there isn't really a satisfying explanation being offered here. What the article is saying sounds like the process is, take profitable business, throw in garbage, somehow more profit. Where's the money coming from?