Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)H
Posts
3
Comments
148
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I follow these simple rules and encourage my colleagues to do so

    1. If I'm just shuffling jsons, then yes, the code should be self documented. If it's not, the code should be rewritten.
    2. If I implement some complex logic or algorithm, then the documentation should be written both to tests and in the code. Tests should be as dull as possible.
    3. If I write multithreading, the start, interruption, end, and shared variables should be clearly indicated by all means that I have: comment, documentation, code clearness. Tests should be repeated and waits should not be over 50ms.
  • The comment section proves that xml is far superior to json

  • And if not US, it's UK, France or Russia

    Then China

  • sings I'm walrus

    He's not a walrus

    WTF

  • How the fuck Trump is useful?

  • Turd sandwich vs giant douche

  • What's your superpower? Mustard cock

  • Sorry, was writing it from the toilet. Needed to hurry in order to not miss a PBR

  • Like yes, but undone armpits generate more wealth than the rocket to Mars

  • God is dead and we have killed him, you piece of shit

  • You slay, babe

  • I don't want to offend anyone, but this sword is STRAIGHT

  • False alarm,hbomberguy did not publish recently

  • Possibly a company that discloses a tiny part of their proprietary code

  • Math

    Jump
  • So fucking real

  • Sounds so painful. We're integrating AI right N now instead of doing what customers asked us to do or instead of fixing a ton of bugs we have.

    I hate corporate

  • I have never thought about it

  • Because I used to be involved in a tiny bit of it.

    Don't get me wrong, they are a beautiful invention in the intersection of physics and engineering. But the algorithms that people are interested in were executed only on ion computers... which are not that great in the sense of scaling. The supercubit quantum computers, which you are probably talking about, are only good for stimulating themselves for a fraction of a second. And don't make me start to talk about neutral atoms, NV centers and "liquid light" platforms.

    The only good they are making is sucking money for fundamental physics from big cats like google, amazon, putin and ccp

  • Haha, yeah man, quantum computer.

    Here's a daily reminder: current quantum computers are fake needed to confess the middle management to invest in quantum computers