I just used the term "post war" to define the second half of twentieth century. A knee jerk reflex from history classes. The participation in the war is actually tangent to my request.
Transphobia is a deal breaker for a substantial portion of the lemmy userbase. Also, other open-source communities are fiercely pro-trans, like Debian. And Ubuntu recently chastised mods for pushing the idea that transness is inappropriate for bios, supposedly because it is seen as sex-related. In this interval you say "nothing new happened", this probably means that the person is question is at least as transphobic as they were back then. If you consider transphobes only get more and more radicalized (Rowling, Chapelle, Mace, etc), it can only be expected to get worse, so that is why I said "at least". If he ceased to be a transphobe I suppose he would be out telling everybody, perhaps add a changelog that pronouns are canonically supported in ML. In the meantime, genocidal anti-trans rhetoric and legislation has only gotten worse, rendering his previous standing on the issue, even if stable, relatively worse from an ethical viewpoint, and if trans people under the new circumstances are more suspicious and feel less safe in the instance, they are fully justified, taking all the above into consideration. Being "as antisemitic as before" for an individual between 1938 and 1942 does not mean the same amount of antisemitism. The amount of things done to us in the surrounding environment has severely worsened, so being on the same ideological position comes with condoning a lot more cruelty against us. Because this is a prejudice and the "amount" of prejudice does not really matter when not only genocidal rhetoric is heightened, but also because right-fucking-now there is all this talk about cracking down on trans online spaces as havens of extremism. If the rest of this comment has not persuaded you yet, then this last part should be an eye opener, because being a fediverse instance admin, in this toxic social climate of intense transphobia is reason right enough for any trans people in ML to pull a reddit-exodus on them. So, yes, keeping the issue afloat is perfectly justified in my view.
Remember when a lady shopkeeper was shot for having a Pride flag outside the shop? Or when Canadian intelligence services reported they expected a rise in hatred-fueled domestic terrorism against trans people?
With republicans, every accusation is projection. The last part speaks volumes, as it seems they are doing it on purpose. They now want to silence those speaking up about it.
Todays news outlets if sent back to 1945: Underrated painter shot in the head by maniacal racist in Berlin. German outrage over frantic celebrations across Europe.
Funny how being subtly irrespectful flies under the radar of the mods, yet you keep insulting after you called the mods on me. Noice. Now, on your original question. Does the article say that civil war in the US is outlandish because the standard of living is high, racial tensions are diminished, and there is not clear geographical division between sides? All three of these premises are wrong. It is ridiculous that I even have to spell this out for you, but the irony is lost by the fact that you felt the need to archive the article, which is so funny that I consider this discussion over. So, dress the world however you want, but civil war in the US is both probable and imminent.
Great article, thanks!