Skip Navigation

Posts
135
Comments
911
Joined
2 yr. ago

libera te tutemet ex machina, and shitpost~~

  • Depression and social media use is also a fatal combination, a lot of people online really shouldn’t be for their own sake.

  • Maybe that was the goal? You can’t tell with people these days. Regardless, I don’t like someone assuming stupid shit about my morals and ethics. I know what I am about, so I’ll just continue doing that.

  • No I won’t edit further, I hate the purity test I am being put through here, so I am just going to stop responding to this thread, thanks

  • I think that lady isn’t asking though? She seems argumentative to me

  • Don’t deny it

  • They/them is grammatically correct for singular nouns, but maybe it’s best to just use neopronouns in the case of someone (like this lady who is opposed to using someone’s correct pronouns) being difficult. But I feel people who want to be difficult are going to be difficult for whatever reason, and it’s not about the pronouns or grammar at that point.

    For reference https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

    Edit why is my comment being read uncharitably by the downvoters? Its weird behavior, I don’t get why someone would do that lol

  • I have a different exposure to feminist movies, so I guess I use that as a barometer. I think older movies with the same themes as Barbie were already highly successful in providing a nuanced commentary on gender power and equality in society, and the role of women, sometimes chosen and otherwise. So that’s Legally Blonde, Persepolis, Wild (w/ Reese Witherspoon), Mystic Pizza, Bridget Jones Diary, and Waitress and some others I am definitely forgetting.

  • You’re an unapologetic 2008 meme

  • rulebunga

    Jump
  • Your fault for not getting a nuclear reactor first

  • Most people are incapable of admitting they like comfort food, but they shouldn’t get to pretend that that’s exactly what it is, doing so just degrades the quality of the arts.

  • lol how was my comment removed for transphobia!? This mod team needs to get educated and needs to read, you’re a joke

    Edit you know what, idc. If someone’s feelings got hurt, then I am sorry. An Internet forum is not the place to air out my grievances with post modern frameworks. I think queer people deserve better, that’s just my take.

  • Removed

    Jerkoff

    Jump
  • I laughed, then cringed

  • Barbie movie, it just didn’t have any interesting message or pov that isn’t already repeated on a weekly basis in the NYT articles

    Edit lol don’t read my comment if you’re too sensitive and easily butt hurt, but it answers the question in the title 🤷‍♀️

  • Don’t take the bait then 😘

    Edit I mean any time anyone makes a comment which makes you tired :3

  • Yes, science is a tool, and it’s a tool for getting towards a fundamental truth or basis of reality.

    Otherkin don’t need to be a part of gender identity to be accepted.

    Species are species, species are not different genders.

    We don’t know currently how to change someone into another species, but maybe someday we might. We also don’t currently have any understanding or consensus of how to define a dragon or make people into one, but maybe someday we might.

    Tbh, I don’t care if someone gets hormonal or genetic therapy to change into whatever they want or identify as, but by definition other kin is not part of a gender.

    That’s not gatekeeping, I am simply saying words like cat, tiger or dragon etc are not genders.

  • I don’t follow how any of that even applies, but really just because you can’t face a reality doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. In fact, one’s avoidant behavior implicitly acknowledges it’s true nature.

  • What exactly was the issue with my posts? Just curious

    Edit apparently gatekeeping and trans med stuff. That’s…a misinterpretation, but it’s okay whatever, lol

  • Rather, I’m saying that we cannot experience the outside world based on our current understanding of neuroscience.

    This is an unnecessary constraint, just because we don’t know how to fully understand or explain something yet doesn’t mean it doesn’t have a basis in reality

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Who dis rule?

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Hats off rule

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Is “diversity hire” a slur? If not, then why don’t we question the competence or qualifications of non-POC hires? Like why are non-POC hires not “cronyism hire” or “familiarity hire”?

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Yeehaw rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Choices rule

  • Ask Lemmy @lemmy.world

    Oh no, you’re famous! Who (real or fictional) would play you in your biopic?

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Newcastle Tramway rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Prulevilege

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Defying physrule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Spirit animal rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Accounting rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Bing bong rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    After pspsps rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Exorcism rule

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    Brainfuck is the sixth circle

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    There is a cat rule

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Rulebian

  • 196 @lemmy.blahaj.zone

    Happiness rule

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    What’s in a name?

  • Programmer Humor @programming.dev

    Stop using floats