There are other disincentives besides price that keep people from going to the doctor if they don’t need to
wait times to get to the doctor
the time spent actually getting to the doctor and being there
social disincentives of having to explain a minor issue to a professional
and probably something else that I forget now.
I used the health care services at my home town once this summer, and I spent two months there. Basic care is free at the point of service there. And I only went because I had had a concussion. Didn’t seem that the other people were there for no reason either.
So you're willing to do a lot of manual package managing, in general put a lot of work into optimizing your workflow, adjusting to different package availability, adjusting to different operating systems...
...but not writing two different configs?
That is your prerogative but you're not convincing me. Though I don't think I'll be convincing you either.
I have separate configs/aliases/etc for most of my machines just because, well, they are different machines with different hardware, software, data, operating systems and purposes. Even for those (most) that I can easily install fish on.
This feels like ragebait. I have multiple devices, use fish whenever that can be installed and zsh/bash when not, and have none of these issues.
EDIT:
or some methods to jump to most recent directory like z.
Manually downloading the same shell scripts on every machine is just doing what the package manager is supposed to do for you. I did this once to get some rust utils like eza to get them to work without sudo. It's terrible.
I mean if all your scripts are fully general purpose. That just seems really weird to me. I don't need to run my yt-dlp scripts on the computational clusters I work on.
Moreover, none of this applies to the interactive use of the shell.
Always confuses me when people say this. You can use multiple different shells / scripting languages, just as you can use multiple programming languages.
In all seriousness, I would be slightly suspicious about any closed source OS's privacy, doubly so if they aggressively advertise AI. But we can't know for sure, it might very respect your privacy in this situation.
Dunno. I just use a private window in firefox and have never had this issue.
I’m on mobile btw
Android? You'll never know what the thing is actually doing.
The other possible scenario is just correlations between your interests and what's topical. A vague interest in privacy narrows things down considerably. Interest in the term may be statistically correlated with a number of other things that you didn't think about.
Yeah, not wanting to see lesbians on tv is definitely homophobia of some sort. On the other hand, since you are conscious of it, it is a rather inconsequential, and you shouldn't feel that bad about it. Just try to slowly be more comfortable seeing things that you would be comfortable if it was a straight couple.
It’s a gradient of more or less unethical things. You could also use the slavery analogy to less and less unethical investments, to reach the conclusion that you shouldn’t invest in anything that you have even the most miniscule ethical issues with.
There are other disincentives besides price that keep people from going to the doctor if they don’t need to
I used the health care services at my home town once this summer, and I spent two months there. Basic care is free at the point of service there. And I only went because I had had a concussion. Didn’t seem that the other people were there for no reason either.