Whoever the comic is so right that even of the number is tall, I expect to see no difference. One of the usual cool headlines that in practice mean noting
OK, cool. So the answer is no then? you didn't really answer.
At some point you are relying on someone not fucking up something somewhere. At the very least you need your ISP not fucking up your connection speed or something similar.
I'm not saying that xmpp sucks or that they are right on saying that there are not alternatives (although I am inclined to agree). What I'm saying is that your server is not a reference point to compare against, because you operate at immensely different scales and requirements
A few years back someone made virus that connected to an llm server and kept finding ways to infect computers in the simulated network. I think it was kind of successful. Not viable for a virus though, but an interesting idea non the less
It is a valid question. I don't understand the punt of this post. If you already know it's a scam then you made a post waiting for people to tell you what you already knew. If you didn't know it was a scam, then you were expecting us to go "yeah, that is the well known real illuminati account, lucky you" which is naive at best.
Pre edit: I have to do some spell checking but if I stop writing this reply to check it now, I'll lose the post and the comment, so I'll post as is and fix later. Sorry
Man. Props to the team. At least from my perspective (I'm not into distro hoping anymore) they came out of nowhere and people absolutely loved them. I should give them a test on a VM, specially since I've been recommending against them because I didn't think they are a good fit for llinux newcomers
That is an old myth. There are less viruses for Linux because there are less users. But if you do things like install priated games, you have the same risk as on windows
I'm not sure this is great advice. In principle it is. But you can't tell a windows user "yes. You know how many of the programs you used to use are not available because they don't make a Linux version? Well a lot of the ones that do you shouldn't use even though the distro supports it for reasons you don't understand"
That is better advice for an intermediate used learning about the dangers (or lack there of) sideloading.
In general o disagree with your stance on a basically semantic reasons: the definition of a trusted source. If I trust a software manufacturer and they tell me to use their flatpak, it's fine because they are trusted, regardless of the format. What I do not like are things like the AUR
Maybe. It was just funny timing.
Whoever the comic is so right that even of the number is tall, I expect to see no difference. One of the usual cool headlines that in practice mean noting