Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
93
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • He sold his first software before it was even finished to his own unuversity.

    He saved Apple to avoid an antitrust trial.

    It's just business right?

  • Thank you! Fixed :)

  • Google docs is a no-go. But I was looking at etherpad indeed.

  • Thank you. I'll check again what it proposes.

  • Then I have to pick a system. I'll check if I can play without a system or something which is out of our way.

  • I didn't see that I could just create character sheets and adapt then during a session. Can you?

  • Self hosting the frontend is eas but since 2 weeks, the frontend doesn't connect to the backend, a private company which updated theeir API.

  • Still thank you. I'll check.

  • I would like to draw a table, add words and numbers, and that's all. I don't want to have to code anything. I am GM-ing Blades in the Dark, with Deep-cut, and some things we took from Fate and others. I want to be able to freely create anything, even in the middle of the session. We don't need automation. I want simplicity.

  • Yes. The backend service they rely on has changed its API and they said that they have no plan at all to follow. I discovered them only after they left peerJs (an alternative, which is interoperable and open source).

  • Thank you but it isn't self-host-able.

  • Yes, but it is closed source and I heard of plug in to add games and so... I don't want to have a table for few stats and items.

    Still thank you for the idea.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world

    VTT (Virtual Tabletop)?

  • Deleted

    Jellyfin inquiry

    Jump
  • On you server: tcpdump -ni any tcp port <your server port>

    You will know if your traffic reaches your server and to what it has to respond to.

    It feels like NAT issue to me. Or DNS :D

  • Apologies for the delay. On the VPN termination point, you have to set the allowed IP addresses. On the case of a client, a /32 is enough. It means that only this IP would be receiving responses. A client with a different IP address would be able to inly send packets, not to get any back, thus not able to get a TCP session. I think it is enough and rhat no additional FW rule is needed.

  • Is Termux still up to date? I thought it wasn't available on android anymore. Is it on something else?

  • You don't really need forwarding as you don't need NAT here.

    A part of the filtering can be done by wireguard by setting the allowed IPs correctly. Just check if only one service is listening on the server port you'll allow.

    Now a question: all without tls right? ;)

  • Same situation here. But Signal is a solution (if you can't self-host nor convince your friends to use something whatsapp-y).

  • And there's no encryption at rest so you can do it yourself.