Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)P

phase_change

@ phase_change @sh.itjust.works

帖子
8
评论
32
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Organic Maps Turns 4 Years: The Privacy-Focused Alternative to Google Maps

    跳过

  • Pretty cool project I’d not heard of. Those offline gps nav permissions seem pretty excessive for a project claiming privacy focus.

  • Paid SSL vs Letsencrypt

    跳过

  • The person isn’t talking about automating being difficult for a hosted website. They’re talking about a third party system that doesn’t give you an easy way to automate, just a web gui for uploading a cert. For example, our WAP interface or our on-premise ERP don’t offer a way to automate. Sure, we could probably create code to automate it and run the risk it breaks after a vendor update. It’s easier to pay for a 12 month cert and do it manually.

  • Protest Songs: why do I feel like there were many more (and many more that were popular) in the 60’s and 70’s?

    跳过

  • Thanks. Very interesting. I’m not sure I see such a stark contrast pre/post 9-11. However, the idea that the US public’s approach to the post-9-11 conflict would have an influence makes sense and isn’t something I’d ever have considered on my own.

  • Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Protest Songs: why do I feel like there were many more (and many more that were popular) in the 60’s and 70’s?

  • How many of you were using Digg during its prime?

    跳过

  • Me too, but I’d put Usenet in there before Slashdot.

  • Kirk sticking around?

    跳过

  • Spock, Uhura, Chapel, heck even M’Benga don’t make it a prequel, but a lieutenant Kirk does?

  • Without looking at a map, what region of the US do you think Kentucky is?

    跳过

  • The South. Just below Indiana, the middle finger of the South. And I say this as a Hoosier for much of my life.

  • Has anyone else been reading linked articles more often on Lemmy?

    跳过

  • I’m the opposite. I had my subreddits curated to ones that supplied good deals discussion for posts and good articles for links. For link posts, I primarily read the linked article and ignored the discussion. Here, I’ve been doing both.

  • If I were Reddit or Facebook I would divide and conquer the Fediverse

    跳过

  • RBL’s are nothing more than a way to block problematic servers. And some of those problems are nothing more than they don’t have a rdns.

  • Jeff Geerling stops development for Redhat

    跳过

  • Does the GPL cover having to give redistribution rights to the exact same code used to replicate a certain build of a product?

    It does, and very explicitly and intentionally. What it doesn’t say is that you have to make that source code available publically, just that you have to make it available to those you give or sell the binary to.

    What Red Hat is doing is saying you have the full right to the code, and you have the right to redistribute the code. However, if you exercise that right, we’ll pull your license to our binaries and you lose access to code fixes.

    That’s probably legal under the GPL, though smarter people than me are arguing it isn’t. However, if those writing GPLv2 had thought of this type of attack at the time, I suspect it wouldn’t be legal under the GPL.

  • What animal or insect going extinct would have the greatest impact on the ecosystem?

    跳过

  • Yeah, runaway global warming might not happen. Plant monocultures would begin to disappear. New invasive species wouldn’t happen, though existing ones might have a better time for a bit. Major thoroughfares wouldn’t create barriers to migration. Dams might take centuries to collapse, but I think humans going extinct might have one of the biggest impacts.

  • RHEL no longer open source

    跳过

  • I believe you are correct. Any paying Red Hat customer consuming GPL code has the right to redistribute that code. What Red Hat seems to be suggesting is that if you exercise that right, they’ll cut you as a customer, and thus you no longer have access to bug fixes going forward.

    I suspect it’s legal under the GPL. I’m certain it violates the spirit of the GPL.

  • A Comprehensive Analysis of the GPL Issues With the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Business Model | Software Freedom Conservancy

    跳过

  • I am not a lawyer, but I have been a follower of FLOSS projects for a long time.

    Me too. I know what I’m suggesting is functionally impossible. I’m wondering if it could be done in compliance with the GPL.

    All of those contributors have done so using language that says GPLv2 or higher. Specifically says you can modify or redistribute under GPLv2 or later versions. So nothing stops the Linux Foundation from asking new contributors to contribute under the GPLv4 and then releasing the combined work of the new kernel under GPLv4.

    The old code would still be available under the GPLv2, but I suspect subsequent releases could be released under a later version and still comply with original contributions.

    Again, I know it won’t happen, just like I believe Red Hat’s behavior is within the rules of the GPL. I’d love to hear arguments as to how Red Hat is violating the GPL or reasons why the kernel couldn’t be released under GPLv3 or higher.

  • A Comprehensive Analysis of the GPL Issues With the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Business Model | Software Freedom Conservancy

    跳过

  • I suspect what Red Hat is doing is compatible with GPLv2, which is how the Linux kernel is licensed. I’m certain what they are doing is inimical to the Intent of GPLv2.

    That raises some questions and possibilities. It looks like the Linux kernel still has the GPLv2 or later clause, despite not moving to GPLv3. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.18/process/license-rules.html

    How possible is it to create a GPLv4 that addresses this? Building a new license that does shouldn’t be difficult. However, I’d assume the Linux kernel isn’t released under a GPLv3 or later because of some objections with those changes. I’d imagine creating a GPLv4 that addresses the Red Hat issue but leaves out the changes in GPLv3 is likely a non-starter because those that have chosen a GPLv3 or later license will object.

    Given the thousands of contributors to the Linux kernel, is an upgrade to a GPL version higher than v2 even possible? I’ve got no idea, but I’m curious of any insights.

  • Why do bots try to join instances?

    跳过

  • Upvotes and downvotes.

    Right now, I can browse by New on my subscribed communities and see every post since the last time I did that.

    I can view or re-view posts and read every response. If the responses are legion, I can play with hot/top and get the meat of the discussion.

    Did you notice that last sentence? On the few posts where there are too many responses to view all, I’ll try to get at those that are relevant.

    If the Lemmy community grows large enough, I’ll need to do the same for posts. I will no longer be able to regularly view by new and have time to see everything.

    So, I’ll need to rely on some sorting method to make certain I see relevant stuff.

    Someone with millions of bots that never post have millions of upvotes and downvotes to influence the score used by the sorting algorithm that I’ll use to decide what to read.

  • Aside from blocking instances, what other controls do admins have to keep unwanted content off their instances?

    跳过

  • But aren’t thumbnails local?

  • Teaching children about online manipulation without creating a paranoid world view subject to manipulation?

    跳过

  • Part of what prompted my question is that I doubt I have the correct worldview because I believe I’m influenced.

  • Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Teaching children about online manipulation without creating a paranoid world view subject to manipulation?

  • Is Lemmy or the fediverse doing anything about the recent surge in users, that could possibly be bots?

    跳过

  • No. They can be used in influence campaigns. They can upvote the posts and comments the controllers want you to see and downvote those they don’t.

    Spam’s obvious and can be dealt with. Bots altering what shows up in your feed is impossible to combat as an end user.

    In some ways, this shows Lemmy is winning. It means Lemmy’s important enough to start trying to influence. It also means we’re about to go through some interesting times.

  • How visible is lemmy on search engine?

    跳过

  • Add to that, I’ll bet search engines that find identical content scattered across different sites rank it lower than content at just one site.

  • Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services. @lemmy.ml
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works
    Question

    Proxmox, xcp-ng, or something else?

  • Old school self hoster: scared of the security challenges of modern hosting

    跳过

  • Perfect! Thanks.

  • Selfhosted @lemmy.world
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Old school self hoster: scared of the security challenges of modern hosting

  • Technology @beehaw.org
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Reddit already looks different for me

  • sh.itjust.works Main Community @sh.itjust.works
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Login problems? Only one active login?

  • Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Attack scenario: vote brigading. How granular is a server’s control of federation/moderation?

  • Asklemmy @lemmy.ml
    phase_change @sh.itjust.works

    Some Lemmy Technical Questions