It costs US$22.50 compared to US$100 for the Ring (that requires a US$10/month subscription). It's going to have some compromises and calling it e-waste for that is weird as hell. 480p is also pawfectly good-enough for the use case as well. Like, when I was growing up 480i was pawfectly cromulent, and most terrestrial broadcast channels are still only 576p50 (on DVB) encoded as MPEG-2. Your doorbell doesn't need to be 2K or 4K, and that's just going to use more drive space for no reason.
Like if you're going to run out of gas in the next 20 miles and there isn't an Exxon station within 100 miles, do you just pass all other gas stations and have your employees break down on the side of the road?
Honestly? Yeah, pawbably. Or you pay for it yourself and go through getting a reimbursement which may or may not happen.
Edit: Just like, you're expecting companies to be intelligent and reasonable, and they just aren't.
It'd be like if ExxonMobil didn't allow their employees with company cars to fill up at a Chevron station.
That is likely very much the case. When you drive a company vehicle, you have a fuel card for fill-ups that is for a particular chain and doesn't work anywhere else.
Think small businesses, charities, local municipal services, etc. Small IT budgets, low staff (if any) and just enough to pad out a subscription cost to a service provider that fits their needs.
Did we not read the same comment? Not every service that was taken down was a website, like OP's school. Plenty of small businesses, charities or local municipal
services don't have IT staff, commissioned their sites (including initialisation) and don't necessarily know that 𝑥 company they pay, pays Amazon. Or how to do a whois search. You clearly don't have a firm grasp on the realities of the world, nor work in IT "doing websites".
That's honestly just a tin-foil hat sort of take, that entirely relies on planning for an unprecedented AWS outage specifically to screw over customers.
Yeah I mean, we've been heavily influenced by the US and UK historically, so we have a deeply racist disposition. Our treatment of Indigenous Australians is as much of a blight on our history as it is for other English-speaking nations like the US, Canada and South Africa. I do still strongly believe we're doing better in a lot of ways, for example we've started using indigenous place names, acknowledging traditional land ownership and other steps. But we're far from perfect, and if you come here with that conceptualisation then you'll definitely be disappointed.
Government's also shouldn't be incentivised to always go with the cheapest option during procurements and tenders. Price is not the only factor in a value calculation and it is insane that we just ignore that fact.
I wouldn’t want my city traffic lights managed by a private company, because they’d try to cut costs and avoid building in redundant systems.
While they aren't run by private companies, the traffic lights at the entrances to most housing estates are procured and installed by the developer, at least in Australia. Without fail, about 12-24 months later, the red and green LED lights will have half a dozen or more dead pixels on them. Meanwhile, newer LED lights installed by the roads department are still going strong years later.
It costs US$22.50 compared to US$100 for the Ring (that requires a US$10/month subscription). It's going to have some compromises and calling it e-waste for that is weird as hell. 480p is also pawfectly good-enough for the use case as well. Like, when I was growing up 480i was pawfectly cromulent, and most terrestrial broadcast channels are still only 576p50 (on DVB) encoded as MPEG-2. Your doorbell doesn't need to be 2K or 4K, and that's just going to use more drive space for no reason.