Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)R
Posts
3
Comments
366
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What's the idea?

  • Don't get it. Suspect it doesn't actually make sense.

  • Yes, obviously that's the thing to do. /s

  • My biggest dream always was to get rid of my parents and live independently on my own but I'm just incapable.

    Is there anything I can do?

    Not while you see yourself as being incapable.

  • in this case, we know it's not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support.

    You're not making any sense.

    the devs no longer offer it as a supported method

    Are you saying that the Home Assistant developers used to support distro packages?

    No one is saying it is impossible

    OP is saying that. They said it was "infeasible".

  • Well, yeah.

    Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

  • it isn't actually that feasible then, otherwise you'd do more than just whine about it on the Internet

    So let me get your logic straight: you're saying that it isn't feasible because if it were feasible then a person who could do it would necessarily do it? LOL that makes no sense.

  • Then do if for your distribution then.

    I use Debian.

    It's clearly not that difficult, you've all but explicitly stated as much.

    I have not said that, or anything like it.

    Perhaps you missed the fact that I'm not a Home Assistant user and have no interest in contributing?

  • Who is yalls go to

    O_o

  • each party

    Who decides who is a "party"?

  • it's entirely Stallman's own fault for being a freak

    Takes notes

  • Deleted

    In Over My Head

    Jump
  • I don’t want to become the “autistic guy” at work

    Why not?

  • You first.

  • the very tone of this thread is suggesting that the HA developers choice in how they distribute their platform is "incorrect"

    Not incorrect, just poor engineering. Anti-social ultimately.

    you seem to disagree with explanations provided as to why those choices were likely made

    I can see only two disagreements in the whole post. Only one of those is about the reasons for creating an OS rather than distro packages. I have corrected a number of factual errors and errors in reasoning but those aren't disagreements.

    Dismissing those statements and observations do not make them incorrect.

    Yes, my dismissing of them is not what makes them incorrect.

    Nothing I stated is dramatic

    LOL "this evil developer is doing a sinister thing"

  • this evil developer is doing a sinister thing

    Nobody has said that here.

    that community

    I've no idea what community you're referring to. Nobody here has demanded that any developers cater to their distribution's needs.

    If your community is getting cut off because, frankly, it's being unreasonable... don't come here looking for a personal army.

    Again, I've no idea what community you're referring to. Nobody has come here looking for a personal army.

    Your characterisation of the commentary on this post seems like that of an overly. dramatic. teenager.