Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

solrize

@ solrize @lemmy.world

Posts
8
Comments
1029
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Migrating to Codeberg — 2025 — Blog — GNU Guix

    Jump

  • Sounds like it would be nice if Savannah offered Forgejo hosting.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Hmm ok, though if a security program needs frequent updates, that's a cause for concern in its own right.. :/

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • So do that. You can do that with Signal.

    Do you know of anyone doing it? Other people have said there are difficulties.

    You wouldn’t register on websites, but you would communicate with them over plaintext. I hope that makes it clearer.

    It is ok, in that era (dialup or wired internet) unencrypted http was basically as secure as unencrypted landlne phone calls. People still have unencrypted phone calls all the time. Typicalally sites would show public content (like product pages on an e-commerce site) by http, then switch to https for checkout to protect stuff like credit card numbers. Encrypting everything became important when wifi became widespread. Wifi hotspots would hijack DNS and spoof entire web sites to steal credentials. Also, LetsEncrypt made it possible to bypass the CA scam industry, making https-everywhere more popular. Public awareness also increased due to Snowden's disclosures.

    The RSA encryption patent also expired in 2000. Before that, US website operators were potentially exposed to hassle if they didn't use a commercial server with an RSA license ($$$). But, it didn't apply outside the US and FOSS SSL servers existed for those wanting them.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Those are nice generalities but I think they ignore reality. Jami seems like sort of a side project to its developers. Bug reports often are answered with a suggestion to make sure everyone is running the latest version of Jami, which is often useless advice. Like if you try to call your friend with your new phone and the call doesn't complete, it's unhelpful for your phone manufacturer to say your friend should get a new phone. You might be interested in helping fix the problem but your friend just wanted to have a phone conversation and doesn't want to get dragged into a debugging project. It's even worse if the other person is not your friend but rather is someone you just met and exchanged numbers with. If you try to follow up with a phone call and there is a problem, GAME OVER. You permanently lose contact with that person. You can't possibly suggest Jami as a Skype replacement after that happens to you once or twice.

    Another thing with comms programs in general is you really can't debug them with just one computer. Their whole function is to let two computers talk to each other, so you need two computers where you control both ends and ideally control the network as well, so you can insert delays, network faults, etc. If the Android version has trouble talking to the Iphone version, you need both kinds of phones. I'm not sure if Jami's devs really understand that. I've worked on telecom stuff in the past and it's just the reality of that field.

    Yet another (I'm not sure of this) is that Jami is a peer to peer program so I suspect some of the problems revolve around firewall traversal gotchas of various types. I don't know if there is a cure for this while keeping the basic architectecture intact. I do like it in principle and I know that people get BitTorrent working reliably without too much trouble, so maybe Jami is just missing some trick.

    Finally, Jami is pretty old and back in those days, people hadn't really thought about the subtleties of encrypted group chats. Signal does a better job, and these days there is a standard (RFC 9420) for how to do it (I don't know if Signal follows this standard). It would be good if Jami were revamped for that, but 1) that would break interoperability again, and 2) I don't know if it's workable at all with Jami's architecture (serverless, using a distributed hash table for peer discovery).

    For now I've sort of given up on Jami and am trying to figure out what to use instead. It's unfortunate that the main devs don't seem to have that much interest in making Jami reliable. Randos like me capable of making small contributions can't really help much with more involvement from the experts.

  • What is class field theory?

    Jump

  • I found the wikipedia article mostly incomprehensible but it says a few things. You are probably better off asking on MSE or Reddit, sorry to say. Wikipedia's math reference desk has slowed down a lot in recent years though that's possibly another place to try.

  • Alternatives to Skype for international calling?

    Jump

  • At least here in the US, lots of mobile phone plans have free or cheap international calls, depending on the countries involved. Example. Some home landline plans also have that. So far that has been enough for me on the few occasions when I've wanted to make an international call. If more frequent, I'd use a VOIP provider, maybe Twilio (I'm sure there are others too, but I know Twilio supports this and has a decent API).

    VOIP providers will often also sell you inbound phone numbers in the destination country, if you want the other person to be able to call you from their landline without it getting rung up as an international call for them. Those aren't always so cheap, but there are obvious use cases.

  • Removed

    Using DVD slot for second 3.5" drive?

    Jump

  • Oh I see. Yeah DVD drives generally use the same SATA interface as hard drives.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Because your status updates and messages are encrypted and stored (until retrieved, of course) once for every recipient, and that includes your other devices and their other devices.

    I'd like to see a numerical estimate of how much data this is. But, it sounds to me like more reason to want to self-host.

    I don't see any point to rehashing the other stuff. Non-TLS websites mostly went away once DNS spoofing at wifi hotspots became widespread.

  • Removed

    Using DVD slot for second 3.5" drive?

    Jump

  • If you mean a 2.5" drive (laptop sized) then yes you can generally do that. 3.5" drives are usually 1" thick and won't fit in a slim DVD drive slot.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Thanks. The more I think about it, the more this seems like outright evil behaviour on Signal's part to pursue user growth, similar to Facebook etc. Imagine that you and your boss are in each other's contacts for obvious work-related reasons. Do you really want Signal notifying your boss that you registered for Signal? For some of us it's fine, but in general it seems like a terrible idea.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Yeah I'm on their Discourse forum, but the situation isn't that great, and it's unclear to me if the problems are fixable. Particularly when there are incompatibilities between version X and version Y, where both versions are already in the wild. You can't travel backwards in time to fix those versions, and this (like email clients or telephones) is an application area where you can't tell people to update their clients all the time. You have to keep things interoperable.

    It's also often inconvenient to reproduce bugs like that in order to diagnose them. If you try to talk to someone over Jami and it doesn't work, you generally can't borrow their phone to analyze the issue. If you're one of the core developers, maybe you have access to a room full of different kinds of phones and OS versions to test with, but a typical user/contributor won't have anything like that.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Thanks. I'm not a sophisticated Android user and so far have just stayed with installing stuff from F-droid. If the official build matches the F-droid build, that's great. At some point I want to spend some time bringing up Android build tools, but I have too much other stuff going on right now.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Interesting, I wonder why it's not in the main F-droid repo. Thanks.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Very interesting, thanks. Do you mean they use SGX (Intel's buggy secure enclave feature)? Any idea what they use it for? If not SGX, do you know what the issue is? AMD Epyc processors have something similar but different, fwiw. If there is such highly secret info on the server though, that makes self-hosting even more important. It also makes the architecture suspect.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • Telling the govt that you registered for Signal sounds like a bad failure as far as I'm concerned, e.g. if you are a user in a repressive regime. Do you think Trump would like to get his hands on a list of all the Signal users in the US? Probably yes. What would he do with the list? IDK but it has to be bad. So it should be an objective of Signal to make it impossible for anyone to create such a list.

    Anyway, it sounds like Signal has wised up and is getting rid of the phone number requirement. I don't understand why people here keep defending the misfeature. I've heard such things explained as "system justification" but I still don't understand it. All of us make poor decisions all the time, but we should at least make some effort to recognize them, and fix them when possible.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_justification

  • Synology Privacy Pollicy? - Lemmy.World

    Jump

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • To truly be safe from Signal’s influence you would need to audit the source code and build it yourself.

    Usually I only install APK's from F-Droid, which always builds its apps from source, rather than using the developer's APK. I'm uncomfortable that Signal doesn't seem to be on F-droid, and I'm in fact hesitant to install it from anywhere else. I'm not currently set up to build Android apps myself. I'm a fairly unsophisticated Android user.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump

  • They are overlapping areas, but they are “two completely different things”. They overlap by sharing common goals, not by being interchangeable.

    They aren't interchangeable but they intersect. Completely different means they are disjoint.

    it proudly advertises you as a signal user to other signal users

    That sounds terrible, a private message service shouldn't advertise anything to anyone. If I subscribe to a subversive magazine, it shouldn't advertise me to other subscribers. It's a terrible invasion if they do. Signal and PGP are both comparable to subversive magazines in that regard, even if the PGP manual tried to say the opposite.

    I think most of us these days recognize that the whole concept of public key directories and signature chains on PGP keys was a conceptual error in how people thought about privacy back then (they only cared about encrypting message content). We like to think we know better now, but maybe we don't.

    Okay? And? In this hypothetical world where Signal offered anonymity but still tied you to your number for other practical reasons, then you’re be correct that it would be a privacy concern.

    According to Wikipedia, they do record some of that info and report it to the government when required. In fact there is further disclosure to them (they might not retain or use the info, but they do receive it) every time you connect to the Signal server.

    Anyway the Wikipedia article indicates they have introduced usernames as an alternative to phone numbers, so they have finally acknowledged the problem and done something about it.

  • Why does Signal want a phone number to register if it's supposedly privacy first?

    Jump
    1. I haven't seen a non-TLS website in years.
    2. Your asserting "two completely different things" doesn't make it true. Privacy and anonymity are not synonyms but they are overlapping areas. Also ISTM you are redefining terms to suit your purposes. Anonymity to me means the message recipient can't tell who you are. If a THIRD PARTY (the server operator) can ALSO tell who you are, that's a privacy failure, not just an anonymity one.
    3. Why does it take so much storage per user? Does it have video uploads or anything like that? A user account should basically just be a row in a database.

    From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(software) :

    In August 2022, Signal notified 1900 users that their data had been affected by the Twilio breach including user phone numbers and SMS verification codes.[105] At least one journalist had his account re-registered to a device he did not control as a result of the attack.[106] ...

    This mandatory connection to a telephone number (a feature Signal shares with WhatsApp, KakaoTalk, and others) has been criticized as a "major issue" for privacy-conscious users who are not comfortable with giving out their private number.[142] A workaround is to use a secondary phone number.[142] The ability to choose a public, changeable username instead of sharing one's phone number was a widely-requested feature.[142][144][145] This feature was added to the beta version of Signal in February 2024.[146]

    Using phone numbers as identifiers may also create security risks that arise from the possibility of an attacker taking over a phone number.[142] A similar vulnerability was used to attack at least one user in August 2022, though the attack was performed via the provider of Signal's SMS services, not any user's provider.[105] The threat of this attack can be mitigated by enabling Signal's Registration Lock feature, a form of two-factor authentication that requires the user to enter a PIN to register the phone number on a new device.[147]

  • Linux @lemmy.ml
    solrize @lemmy.world

    What SATA (or PCIe+adapter) SSD for a Debian laptop?

  • Rust @programming.dev
    solrize @lemmy.world

    Rust questoin, cyclic data structures

  • Privacy @lemmy.ml
    solrize @lemmy.world

    Does anyone here use GNU Jami?

  • Privacy @lemmy.ml
    solrize @lemmy.world

    Is Telegram really an encrypted messaging app?

    blog.cryptographyengineering.com /2024/08/25/telegram-is-not-really-an-encrypted-messaging-app/
  • Privacy @lemmy.ml
    solrize @lemmy.world

    Keeping your data from Apple is harder than expected | Aalto University

    www.aalto.fi /en/news/keeping-your-data-from-apple-is-harder-than-expected
  • You Should Know @lemmy.world
    solrize @lemmy.world

    YSK: Imaginary Problems Are the Root of Bad Software

    cerebralab.com /Imaginary_Problems_Are_the_Root_of_Bad_Software
  • Jerboa @lemmy.ml
    solrize @lemmy.world

    Jerboa comments from new user

  • Dad Jokes @lemmy.world
    solrize @lemmy.world

    What brand of beer do vampires like to drink?