Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

spit_evil_olive_tips

@ spit_evil_olive_tips @beehaw.org

Posts
18
Comments
95
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Comcast Executives Warn Workers To Not Say The Wrong Thing About Charlie Kirk | 404 Media

    Jump

  • a contributor who made an unacceptable and insensitive comment about this horrific event

    have you read the actual statement that got him fired?

    from wikipedia:

    On September 10, 2025, commenting on the killing of Charlie Kirk, Dowd said on-air, "He's been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this, who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups. And I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that is the environment we are in. You can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that's the unfortunate environment we are in." Dowd also speculated that the shooter may have been a supporter.

    you can agree or disagree with the decision to fire him (I'm not shedding any tears, Dowd was the chief strategist for the 2004 Bush re-election campaign, it's ludicrous that he was working for a supposedly "progressive" network like MSNBC in the first place)

    but characterizing that statement as "celebrating murder" is just bullshit.

  • Comcast Executives Warn Workers To Not Say The Wrong Thing About Charlie Kirk | 404 Media

    Jump

  • How the fuck does the government have this much control over the media?

    wealthy oligarchs purchased the media, and purchased the government. so it's not the government controlling the media directly, it's just that they report to the same boss.

    would you like to know more?

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • My best guess is that you were going for “hypothetical.”

    no, if I meant hypothetical I would have said hypothetical. notice that I gave two hypotheticals - Brinnon-Redmond and Tacoma-Redmond. only the Brinnon one was pathological.

    let's go back to 9th grade Advanced English and diagram out my comment. that sentence is in a paragraph, the topic of which is "some shit about Seattle's geography that people who've never lived here probably don't know". notice I'm talking about geography. I wasn't saying anything about Brinnon's population, or the likelihood of its residents working at Microsoft. that was entirely words you put into my mouth and then decided you disagreed with.

    if you think pathological is the wrong word choice there, then no I don't think you actually understand what it means, at least not in the context I was using it. from wikipedia:

    In computer science, pathological has a slightly different sense with regard to the study of algorithms. Here, an input (or set of inputs) is said to be pathological if it causes atypical behavior from the algorithm, such as a violation of its average case complexity, or even its correctness.

    there's crow-flies distance and there's driving distance, and obviously driving distance is always longer, but usually not that much longer. playing around with Google Maps again, Seattle-Tacoma is 25 miles crow-flies but 37 miles driving, for a ratio of 1.5. that seems likely to be about average. the Brinnon-Redmond distance, without the ferry, gives you a ~3.7 ratio. that's an input that causes significantly worse performance than the average case. it's pathological.

    the closest synonym to pathological in this context would be "worst-case", but that would be subtly incorrect, because then I would be claiming that Brinnon is the longest driving distance out of all possible commutes to Redmond within a 50 miles crow-flies bubble. you'd need some fancy GIS software to find that, not just me poking around for a few minutes in Google Maps.

    (and this is the technology sub-lemmy, in a thread about something that will mostly affect software engineers, and planning out a driving commute is a classic example of a pathfinding algorithm...using "pathological" from the computer science context here is actually an extremely cromulent word choice)

    there seems to be a recurring pattern of you responding to me, making up shit I didn't actually say, and then nitpicking about it. recently you accused me of "trying to both-sides Nazis". please stop doing that.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • We’re seriously citing a population of 900 people on the Olympic Peninsula as somehow central to the RTO order?

    I said "for a pathological example"

    if you don't know what that term means, you can look it up.

  • I Hate My Friend: The chatbot-enabled Friend necklace eavesdrops on your life and provides a running commentary that’s snarky and unhelpful. Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.

    Jump

  • But I’m still able to use it, so.

    yeah. except when you're not.

    because this "I can do whatever I want" Ron-Swanson-wannabe brand of libertarianism is very predictable.

    if you go to a dinner party and the host notices your Spyware Amulet and says "turn that off or leave my house" would you respect their property rights? without pissing and moaning about it?

    if a bar or restaurant banned them (like happened with Google Glass) would you respect that rule as well?

    if you were on a date, and your date noticed and said "that's kinda creepy, would you mind turning it off?" would you do it? or would you start ranting about how it's not infringing on your date's rights?

  • I Hate My Friend: The chatbot-enabled Friend necklace eavesdrops on your life and provides a running commentary that’s snarky and unhelpful. Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.

    Jump

  • yeah, no, we still disagree. I think you are missing the point completely, and continually.

    general protip: if the conversation is about some behavior being creepy or weird or against social mores, and you jump in talking about the legality of it, you are missing the point, and also contributing to the creepiness.

    for another example, upskirt photography was legal in the US until 2004 (at least at the federal level, state laws seem to have trickled in around the same timeframe)

    hop in a time machine back to 2000, and imagine there's a digital camera that's marketing itself as being very easy to attach to your shoe in order to take surreptitious upskirt photos.

    people say "wow that's a fucking creepy product" and you jump in to say that technically it's not illegal, and people have the right to attach cameras to their shoes. and if a woman is wearing a skirt in a crowd of people, and sees a guy with a camera on his shoe, she has the right to walk away from him. that is technically true, and also completely misses the actual point.

    if you think upskirt photos are a bad analogy, here's a reddit thread from 2 weeks ago about a gynecologist wearing the "Meta Ray-Ban" sunglasses that have a built-in camera.

  • I Hate My Friend: The chatbot-enabled Friend necklace eavesdrops on your life and provides a running commentary that’s snarky and unhelpful. Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.

    Jump

  • "data is the new oil"

    most people keep their phones in their pockets, which would ruin audio quality for 24/7 listening, and Apple and Android are able to restrict app permissions as well to prevent it.

    VC money doesn't care about whether normal people actually want a device like this. what they're really after is "we're collecting a bunch of user-specific data that no one else has, that we can sell to people who think it'll help them do better ad targeting (among other things)"

  • I Hate My Friend: The chatbot-enabled Friend necklace eavesdrops on your life and provides a running commentary that’s snarky and unhelpful. Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.

    Jump

  • people have the right to do things you personally disapprove of

    meanwhile, literally in the headline:

    Worse, it can also make the people around you uneasy.

    no one is saying you don't have "the right" to wear this Spyware Pendant in your one-party consent state.

    people are saying it's creepy and you're jumping in defending it with "well, technically, it's not illegal, depending on state law". you're just completely missing the point entirely.

    this is like, if someone wrote an article about how people are annoyed by someone microwaving fish in the office cafeteria, you chimed in with "well they can simply quit and find a different job where people don't microwave fish at the office".

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Puget Sound-area employees: If you live within 50 miles of a Microsoft office, you’ll be expected to work onsite three days a week by the end of February 2026.

    "return to office" mandates are always, always, always a form of stealth layoff.

    people structure their lives around their commute (or lack thereof). if you can work from home and don't have to go to the office like it's 2019, it opens up a bunch of places to live that wouldn't be feasible otherwise.

    this will force a bunch of employees into godawful commutes, or require them to move to be closer to the office. that'll be relatively easy for younger employees who most likely rent an apartment and don't have kids, but much harder for older / more experienced people who own houses, have kids, a partner with their own job, etc. lots of people will just quit instead - constructive dismissal.

    also, I suspect many people who aren't familiar with the Seattle area will read "50 miles" and think "about an hour's drive"...lmao. 50 miles as the crow flies, in Seattle's geography, can be a multi-hour drive, possibly including a ferry ride, before considering traffic delays. for a pathological example, Brinnon to Redmond is 35 miles in a straight line, but 130 miles driving distance, or 75 miles driving distance if you take a ferry. (and there can be a multi-hour wait just to drive on to the ferry during peak times)

    even if you constrain it to 50 miles driving distance - Tacoma to Redmond is 43 miles driving distance according to Google. if you ask it for driving directions and specify "arrive at 9:30am" you get an estimate of "typically 1 hr to 2 hr 30 min". public transit takes 2 hours, and that's assuming you're leaving directly from downtown Tacoma.

  • Tech CEOs Praise Donald Trump at White House Dinner

    Jump

  • An AI Social Coach Is Teaching Empathy to People with Autism

    Jump

  • Research has shown that practicing social interactions with professionals in a clinical face-to-face intervention can improve outcomes for individuals, but these solutions are often costly or not widely available.

    the common theme every single time I read about LLM chatbots being used for mental health - having human therapy is great but it's just too expensive for regular people. and that's treated as an immutable fact about society that can't be changed. ("it is easier to imagine an end to the world than an end to capitalism")

    human therapy is too costly? OK, make it cheaper, or free, for the patients. it's not widely available? OK, pay the therapists more, and give them better working conditions.

    but where will the money to do that come from?

    Silicon Valley is spending billions of dollars building AI datacenters. so I dunno, where is that money coming from?

    resource allocation is a choice that we as a society, and a species, make. we can make different choices. we don't need to confine ourselves to "well human therapy is expensive, so only rich people can access it, and poor people have to settle for AI slop, but they should be grateful because without the AI slop they'd have nothing at all".

  • How much does storage speed affect your games?

    Jump

  • a cheap docking station with two SATA slots (currently housing hard disks) and putting them together on a RAID0 almost doubles a single one’s performance.

    you can buy a 50cc moped and attach a NOS cylinder to it. that might be a fun hobby project, if you're into it.

    but in a drag race, you're going to get beat by a 10 year old Toyota Prius. because there's only so much you can eke out of a 50cc engine.

    "RAID0 using a cheap 2-slot external enclosure" is one of the more cursed things I've ever contemplated. firmly in "just because you can doesn't mean you should" territory.

  • MIT report: 95% of generative AI pilots at companies are failing

    Jump

  • the remaining 5 percent are totally awesome and doing great and hey check out these jangling keys aren't they shiny and interesting

  • How much does storage speed affect your games?

    Jump

  • short answer: buy NVMe. plug it directly into your motherboard, don't use an enclosure. forget about wonky RAID0 crap.

    longer answer:

    SATA SSDs (which you say in the comments below are all you've got) are an evolutionary dead-end. they're SSDs pretending to be very fast hard drives. they end up being bottlenecked by the assumptions that the SATA protocol makes about how fast a hard drive can be.

    look at this chart for example. SATA (AHCI) limits a device to having 32 commands queued up at once, which means the operating system needs to jump through hoops in terms of maintaining its own queue of pending reads & writes and issuing them to the device as queue space becomes available.

    NVMe raises that limit to 64k, which for any non-server workload is effectively unlimited. the NVMe drive can respond to IO requests pretty much as quickly as the OS can dispatch them.

    if you want to know more nitty-gritty details, Scaling ZFS for NVMe is an interesting talk, much of it isn't specific to ZFS, but instead is about how NVMe devices are so fast that they're forcing filesystem developers to rethink long-standing assumptions about drives being slow.

  • The Left is Always Right Too Early

    Jump

  • I’m criticising the headline not the article.

    there's a pattern here...did you only read the 2nd half of my comment?

    because you were also complaining about Clinton and Starmer being mentioned, but they aren't in the headline. they're in the first paragraph of the article.

    the vibe you're giving off here is that you read the headline and the first paragraph, decided you didn't like the entire article based on that, but then decided to post comments criticizing it anyway.

    asking ChatGPT to criticize the article would result in more substantive criticism than what you're doing.

  • The Left is Always Right Too Early

    Jump

  • Oh yes those infamous left wingers like Clinton and Starmer.

    they were mentioned in the first paragraph. did you read the article beyond that? because it's quite clear that they're not claiming Clinton or Starmer to be left-wing.

    What a weird headline. In what sense are we too early?

    gosh, if only there was something to read other than the headline that would explain the point the author is trying to make...

  • UK Asks People to Delete Emails In Order to Save Water During Drought

    Jump

  • I've always called it "getting mail-blasted on the information superhighway" but not many dictionaries include this alternative usage, and Merriam-Webster filed for a restraining order against me.

  • This startup wants to use the Earth as a massive battery

    Jump

  • yeah, the scalability of this seems like a pretty big challenge

    annoyingly, they talk about the amount of water they pumped only in terms of energy (35MWh) and not in terms of water volume.

    I think they do that because, if you estimate the water volume...it's pretty unimpressive.

    going off the numbers for Bath County Pumped Storage Station, the largest in the US, and until 2021 the largest in the world:

    total storage capacity of 24,000 MWh - meaning that this power station built in the late 70s / early 80s has almost 700 times the storage capacity of this 35MWh demo

    between their upper reservoir and lower reservoir, their water capacity is 78.4 million cubic meters. so as a crude estimate, Quidnet's demo project used ~115,000 cubic meters.

    Olympic swimming pool contains 2.500 cubic meters. so, again with the caveat that this is a rough estimate because Quidnet didn't publish the actual numbers...this demo they're bragging about involved 45 Olympic swimming pools worth of water.

  • This startup wants to use the Earth as a massive battery

    Jump

  • yep, 100%

    that's even one of their main selling points:

    And Quidnet’s approach, which uses commercially available equipment...

    this seems to fall into the bucket of "fossil fuel industry looking for ways to diversify and still make profits even as fossil fuel usage declines"

    also notable is that fracking for oil is typically a one-time (or at least time-limited) thing. you do it to some rock formation, extract the oil or natural gas from it, and then move on to another formation.

    what they're pursuing here seems to be repeated fracking, pumping water in and back out over and over again. this article about Racoon Mountain in TN for example, mentions a daily pumping cycle - fill up the reservoir using excess nuclear power at night, then drain it during the day.

    they're claiming success based on pumping in water, sealing it up for 6 months, then pumping it back out again. that's very different from pumping water in and out of this "impermeable" rock every 24 hours, for years or decades (Racoon Mountain was built in the 1970s)