Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)U
Posts
4
Comments
124
Joined
7 mo. ago

  • If you're down, absolutely.

    What I'm getting so far (from the reviews and your comment) is that deregulation could incentivize more housing construction, but there's a massive asterisk that Klein and Thompson are avoiding.

    My opinion so far is they either earnestly believe in the neoliberal promise that "if you just get out of the way, the free market can solve anything" or (more cynically) they're seeding the terrain edify buzzwords for a Democratic comeback campaign.

    Either way, you've convinced me to put it on my to-read list.

  • Most of what I've read about Abundance is a general distrust for their arguments.

    The abundance agenda’s fundamental sleight of hand is that, by unleashing the private sector from burdensome consumer protection, labor standards, and zoning regulations, American consumers might recover their lost purchasing power and living standards without the state directly tampering with workplace standards or wage levels. The private sector would supply more goods at lower costs—if only it could. That hasn’t panned out in Colorado, and it’s unlikely to elsewhere. (thebaffler.com) :::

    David Sirota, the founder of Lever News and a former Bernie Sanders speechwriter, summed up one stinging progressive critique of the whole project: “Abundance™ being defined as ‘kill zoning laws and corporate regulation’ but not ‘give everyone decent medical care’ — that’s the tell, and you’re the mark.” It’s true that this is not a focus among the advocates of abundance. Relaxing zoning laws won’t do anything to bring us universal health care or bolster the social safety net. It may not even, in the short term, do enough to create affordable housing. (nymag.com :::

    spoiler He also argues that they ignore the real obstacles to efficiency and abundance: corporate corruption driving artificial scarcity.

    [T]he takeaway from the broadband tale is that the biggest obstacles to efficiency and abundance are often corporate power and its corrupting influence on our politics — factors typically downplayed or unmentioned in the Abundance Discourse. ... We could pass all the federal permitting reforms Klein and Thompson could dream of, but if powerful fossil-fuel interests continue to call the political shots, we’ll never achieve the clean energy build-out we desperately need. ... In many of those areas, there’s no actual scarcity of structures that could be living space. It’s just that corporations and oligarchs hoarding wealth and land aren’t being compelled by zoning and tax laws to open up the space for housing.

    As someone who's actually read the book, have these criticisms been handled and no one noticed, or would they need to publish a revised edition?

  • What's the game from the link thumbnail?

  • In two years, only these two guys thought of buying more shampoo.

  • Your Honor, I rest this guy's case.

  • I think it's normal to not be into stuff.

    Hating stuff that you have the option to not interact with seems like extra work.

  • by that metric basically any war since globalisation is a proxy war

    I would argue that practically every war since globalization is a proxy war.

  • I'm not making it past day 1.

  • I just don't know, man.

    I think their songs would make for interesting comics, though!

  • LocalSend is open-source and great for file transfer (or even just sending text) between my devices.

  • Flashbang warning for anyone following that link.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • What does Chenoweth consider is violent?

    Where's the line where she would classify your movement as violent (and therefore likely to fail)?

  • I barely know anything about you or the service, but your posts in that thread actively drive me away from it.

  • Agreed. Call yourself whatever you want.

    I consider this:

    One part sarcasm, one part hoping they'd actually do it and get in trouble.

    as underhanded and immature. What kind of argument were you having?

  • What you do is you go into the tumblr mines to screenshot someone else's considered takes, and then be the first to post it somewhere else.

  • A pot o' pho? Isn't that a French thing?

  • I would go broader and say that the privilege of wealth is freedom from consequences.