Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
228
Joined
12 mo. ago

  • i'd combine fat and protein into one and go to a brazillian steakhouse.

  • That's kinda what it expects actually, because for the majority of human evolution we didn't have guaranteed meals at regular(ish) times like we do now and what we did have would vary wildly in nutritional value. there should be no issues except the... aftermath of certain meals.

  • regular computers were useless except for basic addition and multiplication for a long time, and now we have the internet. quantum computers, when they are ready, will be capable of doing calculations much faster than it's even physically possible for normal computers to. just because it isn't ready yet doesn't mean it will never be useful. your take is shortsighted and ignorant of how developing new stuff works.

  • how can a thing that has existed for years be impossible?

  • You can't piss off the haters if you're dead.

  • I'm not a Republican, but I am a good bit more right than a lot of the fediverse tends to be (consider myself centrist, also refuse to align with a party on principle). I think they are doing a terrible job of diplomacy right now. I do think it is an intentional thing (on account of that's kind of who trump is) but I still think this much stuff against our allies is really stupid. I don't want to say too much as I didn't vote this year (forgot until too late) and by my standards that means I don't get to complain, but I can say I disagree with their methods overall, even though I may not disagree with everything they are trying to do.

  • in some people it is a racism thing, but generally it's just a generalisation done either to ask a genuine question about a group or to facilitate a joke. while they may not always be true, these generalisations often are genuinely a thing that a group tends to do more than other groups.

  • no more issues since that one thing i mentioned in matrix

  • the cultures that were around when abrahamic religions (christianity, judaism, islam, and all offshoots whether considered separate or not) were the patriarchal (men in charge) and misogynystic (prejudice against women). this was adopted into their religion, which in turn influenced the future of their culture and any cultures it took hold in. large islamic and christian states such as the ottoman empire, the (later) roman empire, and the catholic ~empire~ i mean church spread this to pretty much all of europe and the middle east. colonialism spread this influence to the americas and part of africa. this large influence, along with trade, also affected religions in places that were not affected as much, such as asia and the parts of africa they didn't colonise. this resulted in pretty much all of the non-asian world having a abrahamic religion as their biggest one, which caused the various african, pre-catholic european, and pre-colonial american religions to be either eradicated or forgotten. it also prevented the prominent asian religions (which were already well-established at that point, and did the same thing as the previous point to the areas they were in) from spreading much further.

    as it's relevant to the topic, I feel like I should mention that I am a christian. I don't think anything I said here was biased, but if i missed something important please let me know so i don't accidentally misrepresent other religions.

  • when the obvious troll is obvious

  • I've seen some clips, is it worth watching?

  • at the moment of its creation yes, but the moment either of us experiences anything we will be different. because this will happen instantly (bc I would have to still be alive for a copy to be possible) the answer is no.

  • I may have issues I never had on windows but I have way fewer issues and if I mention them online roughly half the time a dude who develops the thing that caused it sees it and, completely unlike any microsoft employee, gives a fuck. I once mentioned that I experienced a bug in the only mbin mobile app in reply to a post that was related to mbin but not the app (directly, anyway) and jwr1, the guy who makes that app, responded asking what it was.

  • no, because you cannot hold one person accountable for the actions of a different person unless they directly enabled it.

  • I have seen the reasoning they are actually presenting, and it is just various versions of "but I don't want this to be here" even though they have the option of not interacting with it. nobody is forcing maintainers to support rust code in the thing they maintain, they just can't prevent rust code from interfacing with it. their arguments are based purely on not wanting to interact with rust but they don't have to, so they are wrong to block it.

  • being new does not mean you do not have the right to develop the same way everybody else is. they did not start these issues, there were C people causing issues for no reason other than not liking rust that started it.

  • cry about it?