I dunno why but I'm somehow bothered by the post on an emotional level. I do not want to accuse anybody, it's primarily my own issue of course.
The first thing I thought of was transgender men getting told to present feminine. I think nobody should be told how they should dress.
I know it's a meme and I am taking this a bit too seriously.
Anyways skirts are cool and can be cute and feminine like in the op or cool and masculine like a kilt. It's a very versatile garment everybody could wear more often.
Correct me if I'm wrong but the Linux Kernel itself does not enforce a directory structure at all. It's the user space (including the init ram image) that mounts the system directories wherever they want them.
Edit: Besides inside mountable system filesystems like sysfs or /proc etc
Let me give another counterexample.
Let x be the binary expansion of pi i.e. the infinite string representing pi in base 2.
Now you will not find 2 in this sequence by definition but it's still a non-repeating number.
Now one can validly say that we restricted our alphabet and we should look only for finite strings with digits that actually occure in the number. The answer is the string "23456789" concatenated with x.
No this does not work. Counter example can be found in the comments here of a non-repeating number that definitely does not contain all finite strings.
Edit: I think the confusion is about the word non-repeating. Non repeating does not mean a subsequence cannot repeat but that you cannot write the number as a rational or with a finite decimal representation. I.e. it's not 3.ba repeating. Where a is a finite sequence that repeats infinitely and b is a finite sequence.
Edit edit: another assumption you make is that pi does not go into a loop of some kind. You would need to prove that.
Extremely limited password length. I think it was around 6 or 8 characters. Exactly! So every password was the same length.
No other requirements. The best part? It was a bank. But not a customer facing service.