Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)Z
Posts
2
Comments
67
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I've done something similar in Ireland, where ISP router was the only way to connect. Managed to setup everything on OpenWRT router, but it kept disconnecting, so I put openwrt router behind ISP router.

    Interesting thing I found in ISP router is DMZ host - just point it to your own router and that's it. Basically ISP router doesn't exist lol.

    Then you have absolute freedom with your router.

  • Isn't "MAC NAT" you are after? I've seen Mikrotik has this feature to perform NAT for bridge devices. EDIT: no, since your ISP might check at DHCP leases and realise that you are cheating. Go with regular router instead.

    Also regular router would be sufficient IMO. Also don't forget to set static TTL value so your "ISP" doesn't see that you have a router between your devices.

    Also create MAC address and save it. Always change it before connecting - you will have less trouble.

  • "The Infographics Show" kind of my favorite.

    Also recently seen video "Tourism in Afganistan" recorded less than year ago. Interesting content I would say.

  • Basically Lemmy, except:

    1. It has decentralized accounts, or ability to manyally setup sync up to 5 instances, so instance downtime wouldn't impact user.
    2. Ability to upload videos, or some kind of close integration to "video fediverse" of some sort purelly for uploading videos. Peertube is not this.
  • IMO if you are asking such question - stick to Bitwarden cloud.

    Passwords, at least to me, is something I don't want to lose. I don't trust myself I could provide a proper uptime & security, so I just use cloud version.

  • Try to keep them matched up for a better experience.

    You forgot "frame latency" 😅

  • Here is the example docker-compose.yml:

     
        
    services:
      caddy:
        image: caddy
        container_name: caddy
        volumes:
          - ./caddy/data:/data
          - ./caddy/config:/config
          - ./caddy/Caddyfile:/etc/caddy/Caddyfile
        ports:
          - 80:80/tcp
          - 443:443/tcp
          - 443:443/udp
        restart: always
    
      lemmy:
        image: lemmy
        container_name: lemmy
        ...
    
      

    Before executing, create a new directory caddy i working directory, then create new file Caddyfile in it (lemmy is a container name):

     
        
    mydomain.com {
        reverse_proxy lemmy:<lemmy_container_http_port>
        encode zstd gzip
    }
    
      

    Then fix your UDP Buffer size, so it's compatible with QUIC: https://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/wiki/UDP-Buffer-Sizes

    And that's it. tcp80, tcp443 and udp443 should be reachable from anywhere, as Caddy out of the box uses ACME to retrieve TLS certificates for your domain.

    Give it a try. Honestly Traefik is shit for a simple load balancer. It's more suited for large enterprises and kubernetes services, but it also has numerous issues, such as basic auth performance issues, lack of headers customization as well as in overall somewhat difficult configuration. Caddy makes it straightforward & simple, which is perfect for simple users who love to self-host.

  • I tried using Traefik in big corporation, 20+ different load balancer and reverse proxy (all with TLS termination) rules.

    Caddy not just worked, but also worked faster and was WAY simplier to setup (using Caddyfile and reverse_proxy directives) than Traefik.

  • 😅

  • Oh man, you wouldn't believe me - just inhale it lol.

  • It's easy for me to get addicted to nicotine. I guess it's just me lol.

  • Lmao no. Just how "vaccines cause autism" never changed...

  • I get your point and I agree with you, but let me clarify what I was talking about.

    The idea is a very small office where people don't focus on working with computer, but rather use computer to help certain tasks, process payments, save something to MS Excel and so on. Those people don't really need laptops, so stationary devices are perfect.

    Just focus on what I wrote. I am the "admin" of such "small office".

    Intel nuc is perfect solution for me, the performance is more than enough and small size factor really takes the cake. I am really sad that NUC goes away and hope that soon there would be alternative. ✌️

  • Deleted

    BTW

    Jump
  • That makes a lot of sense. Thanks!

  • Deleted

    BTW

    Jump
  • I've never tried Gentoo, but honestly been looking into it for quite some time. I just don't see any benefit (therefore have no motivation) to try it. Prove me wrong, tell me why I should use Gentoo instead of Arch Linux?

    Personally I only see disadvantages. I need package? Most of them are available in official repos or Flatpaks, if not - AUR. Does Gentoo have something similar and as powerful as AUR?

  • I think user asked for a small factor PC, just like intel nuc. IMO intel nuc is a perfect PC for a work desktop. They can even mount on the back of the monitor - excellent feature. Not sure if any other brand has such feature.

  • Deleted

    BTW

    Jump
  • Why would someone use Gentoo if Arch is like "Gentoo on steroids"? Just why? 😅

  • I can't love a modern life without following of what's going on in the world. Internet is the only thing that allows us to do this efficiently.