Kalcifer

Hm, I've come across a number of statements that the GPL isn't well suited to hardware ^[1][2][3], but I'm not well enough versed in IP law to be confident in my understanding or the soundness of their rationale. Directly from the GNU Operating System:

Any material that can be copyrighted can be licensed under the GPL. GPLv3 can also be used to license materials covered by other copyright-like laws, such as semiconductor masks. So, as an example, you can release a drawing of a physical object or circuit under the GPL.
In many situations, copyright does not cover making physical hardware from a drawing. In these situations, your license for the drawing simply can't exert any control over making or selling physical hardware, regardless of the license you use. When copyright does cover making hardware, for instance with IC masks, the GPL handles that case in a useful way. ^[4]

I'm not really sure.

References

Type: Comment. Author: "K900_" ("u/K900_"). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "Can everything be GPL". Author: "cyfyff" ("u/cyfyff"). Publisher: ["Reddit". "r/linux"]. Published: 2019-05-29T04:50:43.079Z. URI: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/buaffg/can_everything_be_gpl/.]. Published: 2019-05-29T04:53:55.513Z. Accessed: 2025-09-04T22:37Z. URI: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/buaffg/comment/ep97hmd/.
[…] The GPL is also a terrible license for hardware IP (see Intel/ARM), for many reasons […]
Type: Comment. Author: "bobc". Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "Using the (L)GPL as an open-source hardware license?". Author: "mondalaci". Publisher: "KiCad INFO". Published: 2015-12-23T18:41:37Z. URI: https://forum.kicad.info/t/using-the-l-gpl-as-an-open-source-hardware-license/1925/1.]. Published: 2015-12-23T10:05:03.944Z. Accessed: 2025-09-04T22:42Z. URI: https://forum.kicad.info/t/using-the-l-gpl-as-an-open-source-hardware-license/1925/2.
[…] In a nutshell, GPL (and all other software licenses) rely on software being something that can be subject to copyright. In general hardware can not be copyrighted, because copyright is only granted to creative or artistic works, but with some weird exceptions like software, IC masks, yacht designs (!). “Useful articles or utility works” are not generally subject to copyright, but some powerful industrial lobbies got some concessions, as otherwise a software “work” would not be protected under IP laws, although specific software algorithms can be patented. […] tldr; use GPL or LGPL, CC-BY-SA, MIT, etc as you like, as a statement of intent, but realise they have little legal teeth. Other OSHW oriented licenses are equally ineffective to protect or control the use of electronic or hardware designs.
Type: Post. Title: "Using GPL for hardware is a bad idea". Author: "BeagleFury ". Publisher: "RepRap". Published: 2010-03-29T1500. Accessed: 2025-09-04T22:46Z. URI: https://reprap.org/forum/read.php?33,40874.
[…] This in my opinion is a critical flaw... If you want the hardware to be open, first and foremost, you need a license that actually covers hardware. I'm not sure why do people cling to GPL when it does not cover hardware components, (If you search for GPL hardware, one of the top items will be Richard Stahlman saying this same thing -- GPL and hardware do not make sense.) […]
Type: Webpage>Text. Title: "Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU Licenses". Publisher: "GNU Operating System". Accessed: 2025-09-04T22:51Z. URI: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLHardware. Location: §"Can I use the GPL to license hardware?".

[…] read how to read a book […]

Thank you for the recommendation 😊

I look at any individual’s history when they post anything sketchy and contextualize. […]

I am concerned that this would distill down to argumentum ad hominem.

[misinformation] is hardly an issue on this platform […]

In my opinion, that statement of yours is, ironically, responsible for why there may be an issue with misinformation. You state it with certainty, yet you provide no source to back up your claim. It is my belief that this sort of conjecture is at the source of misinformation issues.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media? […]

Regarding my own content: I do my best to cite any claim that I make, no matter how trivial. If I make a statement for which I lack confidence in its veracity, I do my best to convey that uncertainty. I do my best to convey explicitly whether a statement is a joke, or sarcasm.

Fundamentally, my approach to this issue is based on this quote:

Rationality is not a character trait, it's a process. If you fool yourself into believing that you're rational by default, you open yourself up to the most irrational thinking. ^[1]

Regarding the content of others: If I come across something that I believe to be false, I try to politely respond to it with a sufficiently and honestly cited statement explaining why I think it is false. If I come across something of unknown veracity/clarity, I try to politely challenge the individual responsible to clarify their intent/meaning.

For clarity, I have no evidence to support that what I'm doing is an effective means to this end, but I want to believe that it's helping in at least some small way.

References

Type: Comment. Author: "@The8BitPianist". Publisher: [Type: Post (Video). Title: "On These Questions, Smarter People Do Worse". Author: "Veritasium" ("@veritasium"). Publisher: YouTube. Published: 2024-11-04T16:48:03Z. URI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB_OApdxcno.]. Published: 2024-11-04T09:06:26Z. Accessed: 2025-03-29T07:48Z. URI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB_OApdxcno&lc=Ugy6vV7Z3EeFHkdfbHl4AaABAg.

What concrete steps can be taken to combat misinformation on social media?

Nope! I do it all manually; though, it can definitely be tedious at times. It has crossed my mind to write a script to automatically generate at least some of them (or even just some of their components), but I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

Also, as a side note, the citation style is my own that I've been "developing". I'm sort developing it as I use it.

I'm not sure if this exactly fits what you're looking for, but the following 5 albums by The Dear Hunter are connected through a shared storyline ^[1]:

References

Type: Article. Title: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Wikipedia". Published: 2025-07-04T01:59Z. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:27Z. URI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dear_Hunter.
1. Type: Text. Location: ¶2.
  Most of the band's albums, starting with their 2006 debut album Act I: The Lake South, the River North, are concept albums and a part of a common storyline, planned to conclude with a sixth installment. The most recent addition is 2016's Act V: Hymns with the Devil in Confessional. Additionally, they have released albums unrelated to the Acts; […]
Type: Album. Title: "Act I: The Lake South, The River North". Author: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Spotify". Published: 2007-05-22. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:29Z. URI: https://open.spotify.com/album/7k0iFGkqIWyOBZBaBCAYg7.
Type: Album. Title: "Act II: The Meaning of, and All Things Regarding Ms. Leading". Author: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Spotify". Published: 2007-05-22. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:29Z. URI: https://open.spotify.com/album/3bxQpENBvT3gHgM9Q7Z20K.
Type: Album. Title: "Act III: Life and Death". Author: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Spotify". Published: 2009-06-23. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:29Z. URI: https://open.spotify.com/album/5B5cJTkPpZRzKMWegoKE78.
Type: Album. Title: "Act IV: Rebirth in Reprise". Author: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Spotify". Published: 2015-09-04. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:29Z. URI: https://open.spotify.com/album/0TCkVVN1AfEtMP3IjVD1Zi.
Type: Album. Title: "Act V: Hymns with the Devil in Confessional". Author: "The Dear Hunter". Publisher: "Spotify". Published: 2016-09-16. Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:29Z. URI: https://open.spotify.com/album/72N545TE36DqJHiyE0YLGE.

In light of certain recent government regulations redefining "child" to mean anyone under the age of 18 […]

Do you mind citing a source for that?

Is this post intended to be a sort of outcry around the idea that there's a risk of malware being in the AUR?

I'm just curious if said consumption goal is based on any scientific rationale, and, if so, what that rationale is.

Lemmy ^[1]

References

Type: Website. Title: "Lemmy". Accessed: 2025-08-03T05:12Z. URI: https://join-lemmy.org/.

Hm, while a witness's testimony may be evidence, iiuc, it would only be one piece of evidence. I think what's important is whether the evidence in question can be considered sufficient.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER! /j

Lemmy is mostly men […]

Has there been a recent survey?

[…] We should not believe absolutely anyone, regardless of gender, making any accusation. […]

Do you make a distinction between "accusation" and "testimony"?

[…] We trust [people] based on credibility and evidence. […]

I don't think this is necessarily the case. For example, one could choose to give someone a chance despite their past wrongs.

[…] someone who has been declared a rapist by a court of law and has been convicted of many serious crimes should never be president of a country […]

IMO, I don't think this is a good idea. My concern is that it may give one's opposition an incentive to find a way to falsely convict them of a crime (or maybe create a new criminal offense) in order to remove them from the running for office.

The burden of proof for a criminal rape suit is really high […]

How do you mean?