Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
4
Comments
585
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I wanted to downvote you for failing to pick up on the sarcasm, but then you went and did all that math that I was too lazy to do and I ended up upvoting you instead. Damn you!

  • Either this is faked for the meme or something is very very wrong.

  • Thanks... I have downvoted my own comment in shame. Godspeed!

  • There's no probabilities involved. The machine predicts the future perfectly.

  • The lever is designed in such a way that it can only be operated by pulling.

  • Yup, that's the premise. It's just an annoying thought experiment. Your actions physically can't change the past, but somehow they still do, because the past was decided based on a perfect prediction of your actions. I was just playing devil's advocate. I agree with your answer 100%.

    "Now" is the moment where you decide whether to pull the lever. As is conventional in trolley problems, this moment can last anywhere from 2 seconds to hundreds of years :)

  • Obligatory nitpick: open weights ≠ open source. For it to be open source, they need to release the training data as well as all the parameters they used in training it.

  • Alas, it is a perfect simulation of our universe with perfect knowledge. Machine learning was not used in the construction of this machine. It can't technically see the future, but it can predict anything perfectly except quantum phenomena. It has been demonstrated in countless trials that it can accurately predict human choices and decisions.

  • Correct, IMO. But right now, before you make the decision.... The machine has already made its prediction. The track either has people on it, or it doesn't. Changing your mind now will not change that. If you are so sure of that decision, then the machine must have put no people on Track B. So now if you do pull the lever, no one gets killed! So why don't you?

  • Reminds me of a trolley problem variant I saw once. It went roughly like this:

    A trolley is headed for Track A, where a single person is tied to the tracks. You can pull a lever and cause the trolley to switch to Track B, which enters a tunnel that you cannot see inside. Track B might have 3 people tied to the tracks, or it might be free of people. You can't see which.

    Two hours ago, a perfect prediction machine inside the tunnel predicted whether you would pull the lever.

    • If it predicted that you would pull the lever (sending the trolley into the tunnel), then it tied 3 people to Track B, thus setting it up so pulling the lever would kill 3 people.
    • If it predicted that you would not pull the lever, then it ensured Track B is free of obstacles.

    The perfect prediction machine is guaranteed to have made the correct prediction. Do you pull the lever?

  • According to https://joinmastodon.org/about :

    Mastodon gGmbH is a non-profit from Germany that develops the Mastodon software.

    [...]

    Mastodon, Inc. is a non-profit entity in the United States that supports the growth and operational capabilities of Mastodon, including being able to receive tax-deductible U.S. donations and in-kind support.

    Doesn't seem like it was a move, just a different entity. Seems like there's a bit more history to this if you want to look it up, for example the German GmbH lost its nonprofit status in 2024, strangely.

  • Brilliant

  • YourJokeButWorse

  • The instance appeared in a list of pubic instances, and its description seemed to match what I was looking for.

    Enjoy your favorite Lemmy communities at tchncs! This instance is general purpose but it tends to attract techy people. It is hosted in Germany.

    That's it. I tried my hardest not to overthink it, and it worked out!

    (I'm not German)

  • Yeah...

    I wouldn't say this is "what GitHub has become" per se, only a handful of unlucky projects need to deal with PR/issue spam. What @[email protected] said is right, the Linux PR spam is largely inconsequential because GitHub PRs (or issues) were never accepted in the first place.

    But then there Express.js, which receives loads of useless PRs because some terrible YouTube tutorials show kids how to make baby's first GitHub pull request: https://github.com/expressjs/express/pulls?page=1&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aclosed+Readme.md So in a way this is what GitHub has become. This and the inescapable AI crap.

  • No.

    A joke like this is funny once. The screenshot in the OP can be reshared endlessly (whether it's real or not), and anyone trying to make another iteration of this joke is just spamming the project with useless noise. It makes work for maintainers.

    Fortunately it seems like this hasn't been a problem in this particular repository, unlike the Linux repository which received endless spam before GH gave them the tools to block it. But if this becomes a trend, Arch might need to deal with dozens of joke issues per week, and there's just nothing funny about that.

    Edit: just confirmed that the OP screenshot is fake, which is good. (Issue #4269 doesn't exist yet and the number itself is two memes.)

  • Technology @beehaw.org

    AI Ruined My Year - Robert Miles

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world

    Is there a movie with a significant portion of it shot through a telescope?

  • No Stupid Questions @lemmy.world

    How does DNA decide the shape of the body?

  • Linux @lemmy.ml

    Can I install Ubuntu 18 software on Ubuntu 22.04? (Technically Linux Mint 21.3)