You just said a bunch of words without answering what makes it wrong to SA a human that can't be informed vs a cow that cant be informed.
The answer is there is none, other than speciesist bs.
The answer is they suffer. They suffer just as much as some humans.
They have just as much ability to consent as some humans(which is none) yet you consider them the same as you would consider a fucking door.
They are not a door. Again they can suffer and doors CANNOT suffer. They are sentient and have desires like not getting SA or not dying or on and on, where as a door is not sentient and does not have desires.
The whole idea behind consent is to not go against someone's desires (If they do not consent) and to go with someone's desires (if they do consent). Just because cows can't communicate consent doesn't mean they don't have those desires that are at the root of why were even have consent in the first place.
Sentience plus communication is literally the recipe for consent. So, yes, it does have a lot to do with it.
Cows are sentient and can suffer. They are nothing like doors. It upsets me that you even compare them to inanimate objects. It's disgusting that you think we can use them, and compare the SA that happens to them like putting a key in a door.
They don't want some random human forcibly shoving their fist inside of them.
They're as smart as human toddlers, and have just as much capacity to suffer.
Sentience has to do with among many other things, the ability to suffer.
These cows suffer because they are SA, have their kids stolen from them and have their lives cut short only to end in some place worse than hell.
So no sentience does have something to do with consent because only with sentience does consent matter.
I don't need to ask a tree consent to cut it down because it does not feel anything.
I do need to ask other individuals for consent because they can suffer.
Well cows wouldn't call themselves "women" no, but I'm sure they do have some gender expression that is apart from just their sex.
I could have said females, but I don't really like using that word.
These cows cannot consent to having someone shove a fist inside them, it is very much SA.
I'm sure colonizers had the same mentality as you when they were SA Women of colour and indigenous women.
Fuck that, I ain't no slave.
My only option under the current system is to sell myself. Funny thing is though, is that I'm a human fucking being, so I get to make decisions.
Installing Linux would remove all of that software.
Your computer essentially disappears from/stops reporting to their systems.
It would likely get removed after a while of inactivity as the lists are cleaned up. All IT jobs ive worked they like to keep the list of computers as alive as possible so that means cleaning up dead or unresponsive computers.
I work IT at a college. I don't really keep any important data on my device. It's all either on OneDrive or Teams, which is OneDrive, or maybe a Share.
I'm not too worried about it.
It may be their computer, but it's my time I'm spending on it. And if I'm going to be doing that it's not going to be on Windows.
I don't want Microsoft hearing my voice or collecting any biometric data. I don't want anything to do with them. They can screw right off. If my job doesn't value that/me, then bye.
I authenticate just fine. Most of our stuff is in the cloud and web based. There's Teams for Linux, OneDrive for Linux. I use LibreOffice, and then the rest I just use the web version.
Outlook, I use the web version. Same with all the shares and print stuff.
You just said a bunch of words without answering what makes it wrong to SA a human that can't be informed vs a cow that cant be informed.
The answer is there is none, other than speciesist bs. The answer is they suffer. They suffer just as much as some humans. They have just as much ability to consent as some humans(which is none) yet you consider them the same as you would consider a fucking door.
They are not a door. Again they can suffer and doors CANNOT suffer. They are sentient and have desires like not getting SA or not dying or on and on, where as a door is not sentient and does not have desires.
The whole idea behind consent is to not go against someone's desires (If they do not consent) and to go with someone's desires (if they do consent). Just because cows can't communicate consent doesn't mean they don't have those desires that are at the root of why were even have consent in the first place.
Here are some facts about cows and how smart they are. Please read up on them before comparing them to a door again. https://vegfaqs.com/how-intelligent-is-a-cow/