Any system can be undermined with enough criminal energy.
People often argue against certain laws that they can be abused if judges collude with the executive.But if the separation of power between executive, legislative and judiciary and the related mutual controls break down then the actual laws don't matter anymore anyway.
I understand the other arguments but I'm confused about this one.If houses that were used to house tourists are no longer allowed to do so, why would they not become available for either rent or sale?What else is there for the owners to do with them?
austerity measure after austerity measure and somehow made our budgetal deficit worse
Not surprising.Reducing government spending means reducing the money that is in economic circulation.Companies earn less, people earn less and ultimately taxes go down.
Ah, I see.So the water is not too warm for cooling, it's too warm to absorb the backfeed, which is a necessary result of the cooling process.Which effectively still means that they can't properly cool the plant because the river water is too warm.
Besides providing verbatim records of who said what, there is a second can of worms in forming any sort of binding agreement if the two sides of the agreement are having two different conversations.
I think this is what the part about the missed nuance means.
Once this has been implemented, something worse can be implemented.
I don't like these slippery slope arguments. You might as well reduce it to any legislation.Once people are allowed to make laws, bad people can make bad laws.Which is why we must continue to vote in the right people, not abandon the concept of laws.
In this case, I don't doubt that copyright infringement and general censorship are on some people's agenda.But this current proposal is bad enough itself and should be opposed because of that and not because someone might make other, even worse proposals in the future.
This principle is called Richtlinienkompetenz (directive competence). He or she can basically order members of his cabinet what to do.
It should be noted, that this doesn't allow the Chancellor to micromanage the Ministers.The Chancellor can set the political agenda and make high level decisions but Ministers have some degree of constitutionally ensured independence in how exactly they implement policies.
Tbf, it sounds like neither side did a stellar job here.
Poland not reacting "for several hours" makes it sound almost deliberate.Then again, I wonder how German police "informed" Poland for there to be no reaction. Did they fax?If they think the situation requires an immediate reply, why not call them? Surely a dedicated border patrol unit would have a contact number.Also, despite Schengen I don't think police can just cross the border to another state unless in pursuit of some fleeing criminal.And just dumping these people in some random location without any involvement of local authorities doesn't seem like proper protocol.
Inflation “going down” doesn’t mean there is no more inflation. It only means that there is less inflation than before
Keep in mind that "inflation going down" is usually shorthand for the year-on-year inflation rate going down.If the yoy inflation rate goes down from one month to the next, then prices are still higher than previous year but may very well have fallen since last month.
Now, I'm certainly no expert on the US legal system. It certainly seems silly if you could circumvent entire laws just by using synonyms but what do I know.However I have been talking about other countries where that is not the case and where the language is not English.So It really doesn't matter whether it say "buy" or "purchase" in English when it's "kaufen" in German or "acheter" in French.
If it is truly anonymized then it isn't protected under GDPR.