wuphysics87

There are what are called 1st and 2nd order effects. Gravity is first order. The sloshing is second order. So as you say, scaling the model up does make additional factors matter relative to your 1 liter of gas on the table. But it's only the first order effects which make an appreciable difference when looking at it on a planetary scale.

Then if you say want to extend the model to your meteorogical model, you have to say, well... the density of air is different over the ocean because of evaporation. The gulf stream moves clouds consistently this way etc. But those things only matter after you've introduced gravity, and understood the earth's atmosphere as the "gravitational balloon" model. Then you introduce your sloshing to understand the next stage.

This way of thinking about things in terms of leading or second leading order effects when considering systems at varied scales is pretty common in physics.

Btw from lived experience I can tell you the only gulf between you and a 150 level physics class is that you are actually trying to learn it.

I think I'm following, but for clarification, when you say "unconfined" you mean bound within a vessel, but the vessel is able to expand? As in your example with heating the planet and the volume getting a little bigger? Or a like balloon?

Likewise with "confined" you mean like a steel can. Completely rigid?

If that's the case, this is my take. It's like having a spherical balloon with a spherical concentric interior hamster ball (stick with me). The balloon can expand and contract with an change in temperature or a change in number of molecules. It contains the entire volume. The hamster ball on the other hand only contains its own fixed volume. Molecules can flow into or out of the vents. The total weight contained within the ball can increase or decrease, but the volume will not.

The force that determines the expansion rate of the balloon and the mass contained within the ball is gravity. Density is diffusive. It decreases with increase in altitude. Increase the temperature and the gas molecules will run faster and faster. Being able to push the balloon out futher. Or, add more gas it will "stack higher".

If you had a purely confined system (i.e. the hamster ball has no holes). You have a pressure cooker. As you increase the temperature of the gas, the molecules move faster and faster, slamming into the walls of the ball. Eventually it will rupture.

All that said, you're correct. So far as I know as I know, earth shattering though it may be, there is no "glass ceiling" which will shatter from climate change (I definitely did that one on purpose and I'm not sorry). The model of the earth's atmosphere is as you say "unconfined" (caveate it is actually confined by gravity)

Final point. You could continue to add gas "indefinitely". That is, until the density at the surface of the earth is large enough to create a black hole. For that, you'd have to consult Stephen Hawking or read one of his paper on Black Hole Thermodynamics. Spoiler: Things can escape the grip of a black hole!

I'm not saying you can't. I'm saying an apology shouldn't be a quid pro quo. It might be that a conversation leads to why you were upset in the first place, but if you are sincere it shouldn't be part of your consideration.

Before reading. If you have to ask, the answer is yes

Edit: My answer is still yes. Based on your title I thought you didn't work for the manager (a manager vs. my manager)

You respect them, you feel as though you disrespected them, and you want to maintain their respect. Apologize. Simple as that.

Where you need to be careful is the transactional nature of the apology. I.e. Maybe if you apologize then you can tell her what she did to piss you off. That's a bad play in any relationship.

You need to think about what that thing is and how it effects the way you do your job. Nuts and bolts. If it's something that improves the quality and efficiency of your work. Bring it up in a meeting. Otherwise, you aren't the boss. Suck it up and deal with it.

P.S. We aren't anti management. We are anti abuse. Based on your description, thid isn't an abusive relationship.

That one episode of tng where the aliens of the week were black people

Or the one where Dr. Crusher bangs the ghost that banged her grandma

She's not "wrong". She knows what she said. She's blaming the left. They already took antifa. She's taking communism.

Have you considered meeting it ín the middle and changing to a more satisfying career?

Given the state of the united states, and the world in general, gaining control over your personal privacy and security are fundamental to any other initiative you undertake

It's important to remember wolves are pack animals so they would coordinate. Depending on the weight difference I think it could be as few as three

I didn't look specifically near the wheels, but mostly it's on the front of the hood. What's the difference? Because you can't paint the wheel well?

You can use rss and write a script to filter/summarize your feed. You can even use a local ai to do some of the work for you. The link comes along for the ride regardless.

Are you talking about rss?

I'm confused by the goal and the plan. You have to get pre check for your job, but you find it invasive. So you ruin one of the biometric samples they take? Won't they look at it more carefully? I doubt they will just throw their handd in the air and say fuck it

What about using lynx or eww?